public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	Nick Warne <nick@linicks.net>,
	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, webmaster@kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.15 patch
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:13:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060104231330.GD14788@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200601042258.24888.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>

On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:58:24PM +0000, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2006 22:31, Greg KH wrote:
> [snip]
> > > >
> > > > The issue I hit was we have a 'latest stable kernel release 2.6.14.5'
> > > > and under it a 'the latest stable kernel' (or words to that effect) on
> > > > kernel.org.
> > > >
> > > > Then when 2.6.15 came out, that was it!  No patch for the 'latest
> > > > stable kernel release 2.6.14.5'.  It was GONE!
> > >
> > > Yes, I brought this up a couple of weeks ago, but I was told
> > > that I was wrong (in some such words).
> > > I agree that it needs to be fixed.
> >
> > How would you suggest that it be fixed?
> 
> It's difficult, but perhaps providing a link to the latest "stable team" 
> release in addition to Linus's release would solve the problem.

But what happens when we release a 2.6.14.y release and a 2.6.15.y
release at the same time (as people have requested this in previous
threads...)?  What would show up where?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-04 23:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-04 17:10 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.15 patch Nick Warne
2006-01-04 17:18 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 17:28   ` Nick Warne
2006-01-04 17:36     ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-04 17:39       ` Nick Warne
2006-01-04 18:34         ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-04 19:53           ` Nick Warne
2006-01-04 20:10             ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-04 22:01               ` Greg KH
2006-01-04 22:10                 ` Nick Warne
2006-01-04 22:15                   ` Greg KH
2006-01-04 22:20                     ` Nick Warne
2006-01-04 22:30                       ` Greg KH
2006-01-04 22:30                       ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 22:36                         ` Nick Warne
2006-01-04 23:10                           ` Greg KH
2006-01-04 22:49                       ` Grant Coady
2006-01-04 22:16                   ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-04 22:31                     ` Greg KH
2006-01-04 22:58                       ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-04 23:13                         ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-01-04 23:28                           ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-04 23:31                             ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-04 23:41                               ` Greg KH
2006-01-04 23:42                                 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-04 23:49                                 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-05  7:30                                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-04 22:49                 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-04 23:12                   ` Greg KH
2006-01-04 23:26                     ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-05  0:08                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-01-05 15:25                     ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-05 15:37                       ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-05 15:55                         ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-05 16:42                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-01-04 20:10             ` Matan Peled
2006-01-04 22:01           ` Greg KH
2006-01-04 22:50             ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-04 17:40     ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 17:45       ` Nick Warne
2006-01-04 17:50         ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 17:51           ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-04 17:56             ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 18:08               ` Mark Lord
2006-01-04 18:13                 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 21:13                   ` Grant Coady
2006-01-04 21:20                     ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 17:56             ` Nick Warne
2006-01-04 18:27               ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-04 21:17                 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 21:48                   ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-04 22:20                     ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-04 17:19 ` Marc Haber
2006-01-04 17:29   ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-04 17:29 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2006-01-04 18:15 ` Matthias Andree
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-05 17:14 mreuther

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060104231330.GD14788@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nick@linicks.net \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk \
    --cc=webmaster@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox