public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mbuesch@freenet.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [patch 5/7]  uninline capable()
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 12:26:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200601061226.42416.mbuesch@freenet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1136546539.2940.28.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1114 bytes --]

On Friday 06 January 2006 12:22, you wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 12:18 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Friday 06 January 2006 11:42, you wrote:
> > > Index: linux-2.6.15/include/linux/sched.h
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.15.orig/include/linux/sched.h
> > > +++ linux-2.6.15/include/linux/sched.h
> > > @@ -1102,19 +1102,8 @@ static inline int sas_ss_flags(unsigned 
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> > > -/* code is in security.c */
> > > +/* code is in security.c or kernel/sys.c if !SECURITY */
> > >  extern int capable(int cap);
> > 
> > BTW, is there a special reason why this is declared in sched.h
> > instead of capability.h?
> 
> probably a lot of historic bagage... anyway not something that should be
> cleaned up as part of this series, could maybe be done in another patch
> if you feel so inclined :)

Oh, well I have more important work to do now. :)
I am sure there are enough people around on this mailing list
waiting for such work... hint hint :)

-- 
Greetings Michael.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-06 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-06 10:37 [patch 1/7] Make __always_inline actually force always inlining Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-06 10:38 ` [patch 2/7] enable unit-at-a-time optimisations for gcc4 Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-06 17:18   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-06 18:48     ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-01-06 19:00       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-06 19:02         ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-06 23:56           ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-01-07  0:05       ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-07  0:20         ` Matt Mackall
2006-01-07  1:11           ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-07  8:47         ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-01-07  9:07   ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-07 10:03     ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-01-07 10:13       ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-07 12:00         ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-01-06 10:39 ` [patch 3/7] mark several functions __always_inline Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-06 10:41 ` [patch 4/7] Mark some key VFS functions as __always_inline Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-06 10:50   ` Al Viro
2006-01-06 10:42 ` [patch 5/7] uninline capable() Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-06 11:18   ` Michael Buesch
2006-01-06 11:22     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-06 11:26       ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2006-01-08  5:51         ` [PATCH 1/4] move capable() to capability.h Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-08  7:45           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-01-08 13:48             ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-08 18:02             ` Tim Schmielau
2006-01-09  1:55               ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-08 18:15           ` Tim Schmielau
2006-01-08 19:03             ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-08 17:19     ` [patch 5/7] uninline capable() Tim Schmielau
2006-01-07  0:28   ` Matt Mackall
2006-01-06 10:43 ` [patch 6/7] Unlinline a bunch of other functions Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-06 12:11   ` [PATCH] pktcdvd: Un-inline some functions Peter Osterlund
2006-01-06 17:29   ` [patch 6/7] Unlinline a bunch of other functions Jeff Garzik
2006-01-07  6:28   ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-06 10:45 ` [patch 7/7] Make "inline" no longer mandatory for gcc 4.x Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-06 17:31   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-06 19:35     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-07  6:33       ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-07  8:34         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-07 19:05   ` Kurt Wall
2006-01-07 19:10     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-07 19:44     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-07 22:13       ` Kurt Wall
2006-01-08  3:16       ` Kurt Wall
2006-01-08  3:56         ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2006-01-08  7:14           ` Kurt Wall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200601061226.42416.mbuesch@freenet.de \
    --to=mbuesch@freenet.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox