From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ric Wheeler <ric@emc.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
akpm@osdl.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, arnd@arndb.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "saparnis,
carol" <saparnis_carol@emc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dasd: remove dynamic ioctl registration
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:21:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060106142146.GA20094@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43BE7C45.4090206@emc.com>
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 09:18:45AM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> >So can we please put this into -mm now so it can go to Linus for 2.6.16
> >still?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> If you could hold off just a couple of weeks, I hope that we can get
> through our EMC process junk and get the GPL'ed patch out to fix the
> symmetrix support part of this rolled in as well,
Why? We never do things to support legally questionable binary modules.
And on the practical side, does emc even ship modules for -mm release?
What's the point of not putting it into -mm?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-06 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-16 14:33 [PATCH 2/2] dasd: remove dynamic ioctl registration Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-16 14:58 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-12-16 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-16 16:32 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-12-16 16:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-16 16:13 ` Ric Wheeler
2005-12-16 19:30 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-01-06 11:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-01-06 14:18 ` Ric Wheeler
2006-01-06 14:21 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2006-01-06 14:29 ` Ric Wheeler
2006-01-11 9:16 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2006-01-17 13:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-01-17 20:50 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060106142146.GA20094@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ric@emc.com \
--cc=saparnis_carol@emc.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox