From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>,
jes@trained-monkey.org, rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk,
hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de,
torvalds@osdl.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk,
linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, mingo@elte.hu, nico@cam.org,
oleg@tv-sign.ru, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, arjan@infradead.org
Subject: Re: PowerPC fastpaths for mutex subsystem
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:43:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060108074356.GM26499@krispykreme> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060107143722.25afd85d.akpm@osdl.org>
> Doens't this mean that the sped-up mutexes are still slower than semaphores?
Wasnt most of the x86 mutex gain a result of going from fair to unfair
operation? The current ppc64 semaphores are unfair.
Anton
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-08 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-04 14:41 [patch 00/21] mutex subsystem, -V14 Ingo Molnar
2006-01-04 23:45 ` Joel Schopp
2006-01-05 2:38 ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-01-05 2:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-05 3:21 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-05 3:39 ` Anton Blanchard
2006-01-05 18:04 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-01-05 14:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-05 16:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-05 22:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-05 22:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-05 22:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-06 3:49 ` Keith Owens
2006-01-06 7:34 ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-01-05 14:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-05 16:42 ` Joel Schopp
2006-01-05 22:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-05 23:06 ` Joel Schopp
2006-01-05 23:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-05 23:36 ` Joel Schopp
2006-01-05 23:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-06 0:29 ` Olof Johansson
2006-01-07 17:49 ` PowerPC fastpaths for mutex subsystem Joel Schopp
2006-01-07 22:37 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-08 7:43 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2006-01-08 8:00 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-08 8:23 ` Anton Blanchard
2006-01-09 11:13 ` David Howells
2006-01-08 9:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-10 22:31 ` Joel Schopp
2006-01-10 23:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-11 10:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-11 17:44 ` Joel Schopp
2006-01-08 10:43 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060108074356.GM26499@krispykreme \
--to=anton@samba.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jes@trained-monkey.org \
--cc=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox