From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
To: Chris Stromsoe <cbs@cts.ucla.edu>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bad pmd filemap.c, oops; 2.4.30 and 2.4.32
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:45:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060108094508.GA14723@w.ods.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601061352510.24856@potato.cts.ucla.edu>
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 01:54:45PM -0800, Chris Stromsoe wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 07:52:36PM -0800, Chris Stromsoe wrote:
> >
> >>I booted 2.4.32 with the aic7xxx patch you pointed me at last week.
> >>It's been up for a few hours. I'll let it run for at least a week or
> >>two and will report back positive or negative results. After that,
> >>I'll try 2.4.32 with nosmp and acpi=off.
> >
> >Thanks for your continued feedback, Chris. Your reports are very
> >helpful, they tend to prove that your hardware is OK and that there's a
> >bug in mainline 2.4.32 with SMP+ACPI+aic7xxx enabled. That's already a
> >good piece of information.
>
> After a little more than one day up with 2.4.32 SMP+ACP+aic7xxx, I got
> another bad pmd and an oops this morning at 4:23am. I'm going to boot
> vanilla 2.4.32 with nosmp and acpi=off.
Well, I'm puzzled. On the one hand, your oopses don't all look the
same, so we could think it's a hardware problem. On the other hand,
your hardware tests did not find anything and 2.6.14 runs fine. BTW,
I also have other machines running in production with an adaptec
29160 like yours and I don't encounter this. It looks like some
memory corruption, but finding what causes it seems very hard. In
fact, it somewhat reminds me the problems encountered by Stephan
von Krawczynski 2.5 years ago. He encountered data corruption when
saving large amounts of data to a DLT connected to an AIC7xxx, and
often had freezes, and sometimes an oops. IIRC, changing the board
for something else fixed his problem.
I've compared the driver between 2.4 and 2.6, and the core has not
changed much, but its interface to the OS has changed a lot, so it's
not easy to identify a potential fix.
Eventhough I don't like this, I would join Roberto's advice to
upgrade to 2.6 and stick to it. If you finally encounter the
same problem on 2.6 after a very long time, then it would be
an indication that the problem is well in your hardware.
> -Chris
Thanks for all your investigations,
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-08 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-27 16:58 bad pmd filemap.c, oops; 2.4.30 and 2.4.32 Chris Stromsoe
2005-12-28 0:10 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-12-29 2:52 ` Chris Stromsoe
2005-12-29 5:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-12-29 9:33 ` Chris Stromsoe
2005-12-29 10:08 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-12-29 12:01 ` Chris Stromsoe
2005-12-31 0:12 ` Chris Stromsoe
2005-12-31 1:48 ` Chris Stromsoe
2005-12-31 4:00 ` Chris Stromsoe
2005-12-31 7:25 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-12-31 11:06 ` Chris Stromsoe
2005-12-31 7:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-12-31 10:39 ` Chris Stromsoe
2005-12-31 10:56 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-12-31 12:08 ` Alan Cox
2005-12-31 13:01 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-01-05 3:52 ` Chris Stromsoe
2006-01-05 5:43 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-01-06 21:54 ` Chris Stromsoe
2006-01-06 22:14 ` Chris Stromsoe
2006-01-06 22:16 ` Chris Stromsoe
2006-01-07 9:19 ` Roberto Nibali
2006-01-09 18:28 ` Chris Stromsoe
2006-01-09 20:16 ` Roberto Nibali
2006-01-09 20:22 ` Chris Stromsoe
2006-01-09 22:22 ` Roberto Nibali
2006-01-10 0:59 ` Chris Stromsoe
2006-01-15 11:29 ` Chris Stromsoe
2006-01-15 12:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-01-15 21:18 ` Chris Stromsoe
2006-01-15 22:38 ` Chris Stromsoe
2006-01-15 22:46 ` Willy TARREAU
2006-01-15 22:54 ` Chris Stromsoe
2006-01-16 20:52 ` Roberto Nibali
2006-01-16 21:32 ` Chris Stromsoe
2006-02-08 6:32 ` Chris Stromsoe
2006-02-08 6:37 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-01-08 9:45 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2006-01-09 18:33 ` Chris Stromsoe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060108094508.GA14723@w.ods.org \
--to=willy@w.ods.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=cbs@cts.ucla.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox