public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Bernd Eckenfels <be-mail2006@lina.inka.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Grant Coady <gcoady@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why is 2.4.32 four times faster than 2.6.14.6??
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:11:24 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200601081911.24624.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060108080048.GA32737@lina.inka.de>

On Sunday 08 January 2006 19:00, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:42:25PM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
> > Excuse me?  there is no 5 minutes wait time ;)
>
> sure there is, you see the real time is 6mins vs 1min. since user and
> system time are nearly the same, the delay is introduced by sleeping io.

He was trying to say it was seconds, not minutes.

Cheers,
Con

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-08  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-08  6:16 Why is 2.4.32 four times faster than 2.6.14.6?? Grant Coady
2006-01-08  6:58 ` Markus Rechberger
2006-01-08  7:18   ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-01-08  7:42     ` Grant Coady
2006-01-08  8:00       ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-01-08  8:11         ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2006-01-08  9:12           ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-01-08 12:04       ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-08 19:20         ` Grant Coady
2006-02-22 19:27           ` Enrico Weigelt
2006-02-22 23:17             ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-08  7:28   ` Grant Coady
2006-01-08  9:57     ` Willy Tarreau
2006-01-08 10:23       ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-01-08 10:54         ` Willy Tarreau
2006-01-08 11:09           ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-01-08 11:16             ` Willy Tarreau
2006-01-08 11:18         ` Grant Coady
2006-01-09  2:37           ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-01-09  2:46             ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09  2:59             ` Grant Coady
2006-01-09  6:56             ` Grant Coady
2006-01-08 11:05       ` Grant Coady
2006-01-08 18:21         ` Octavio Alvarez Piza
2006-01-08 19:27           ` Grant Coady

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200601081911.24624.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=be-mail2006@lina.inka.de \
    --cc=gcoady@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox