public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Chaitanya Hazarey <cvh.tcs@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Back to the Future ? or some thing sinister ?
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:03:23 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060109040322.GA2683@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eaef64fc0601081131i17336398l304038c6dea3e057@mail.gmail.com>

Chaitanya Hazarey wrote:
>
> We have got a machine, lets say X , make is IBM and the CPU is Intel
> Pentium 4 2.60 GHz. Its running a 2.6.13.1 Kernel and previously,
> 2.6.27-4 Kernel the distribution is Debian Sagre.
> 
> processor       : 0
> vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
> cpu family      : 15
> model           : 2
> model name      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.60GHz
> stepping        : 9
> cpu MHz         : 2591.888
> cache size      : 512 KB
> fdiv_bug        : no
> hlt_bug         : no
> f00f_bug        : no
> coma_bug        : no
> fpu             : yes
> fpu_exception   : yes
> cpuid level     : 2
> wp              : yes
> flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid
> xtpr
> bogomips        : 5188.79
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The problem is that, after a some time ( fuzzy , but I think like 2
> hours ) of inactivity or because of some esoteric factor which triggers
> a state in which the time on the machine starts going around in a loop.
> if I do cat /proc/uptime, it goes 4  ticks ahead and again rewinds back
> to the starting count ( not zero, but the moment in time when the event
> was triggred. )
> 
> The problem seems to be specific to the 2.6 series of kernel, not the
> 2.4 series.
> 
> I  would like to know how to go about the debugging of the problem, and
> that which specific part of the kernel will be directly interacting with
> the rtc / system clock.

Look into upgrading the BIOS on that machine; I've had similar
problems on a IBM P4 workstation that were fixed in this way.


  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-09  4:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-08 19:31 Back to the Future ? or some thing sinister ? Chaitanya Hazarey
2006-01-09  4:03 ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2006-01-09 15:26   ` Ram Gupta
2006-01-11 18:32     ` Chaitanya Vinay Hazarey
2006-01-11 22:03   ` john stultz
2006-01-12 14:33     ` Ram Gupta
2006-01-12 18:08       ` john stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060109040322.GA2683@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=ntl@pobox.com \
    --cc=cvh.tcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox