From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Chaitanya Hazarey <cvh.tcs@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Back to the Future ? or some thing sinister ?
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:03:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060109040322.GA2683@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eaef64fc0601081131i17336398l304038c6dea3e057@mail.gmail.com>
Chaitanya Hazarey wrote:
>
> We have got a machine, lets say X , make is IBM and the CPU is Intel
> Pentium 4 2.60 GHz. Its running a 2.6.13.1 Kernel and previously,
> 2.6.27-4 Kernel the distribution is Debian Sagre.
>
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 15
> model : 2
> model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.60GHz
> stepping : 9
> cpu MHz : 2591.888
> cache size : 512 KB
> fdiv_bug : no
> hlt_bug : no
> f00f_bug : no
> coma_bug : no
> fpu : yes
> fpu_exception : yes
> cpuid level : 2
> wp : yes
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid
> xtpr
> bogomips : 5188.79
>
>
>
>
> The problem is that, after a some time ( fuzzy , but I think like 2
> hours ) of inactivity or because of some esoteric factor which triggers
> a state in which the time on the machine starts going around in a loop.
> if I do cat /proc/uptime, it goes 4 ticks ahead and again rewinds back
> to the starting count ( not zero, but the moment in time when the event
> was triggred. )
>
> The problem seems to be specific to the 2.6 series of kernel, not the
> 2.4 series.
>
> I would like to know how to go about the debugging of the problem, and
> that which specific part of the kernel will be directly interacting with
> the rtc / system clock.
Look into upgrading the BIOS on that machine; I've had similar
problems on a IBM P4 workstation that were fixed in this way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-09 4:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-08 19:31 Back to the Future ? or some thing sinister ? Chaitanya Hazarey
2006-01-09 4:03 ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2006-01-09 15:26 ` Ram Gupta
2006-01-11 18:32 ` Chaitanya Vinay Hazarey
2006-01-11 22:03 ` john stultz
2006-01-12 14:33 ` Ram Gupta
2006-01-12 18:08 ` john stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060109040322.GA2683@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ntl@pobox.com \
--cc=cvh.tcs@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox