From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161013AbWAKHDD (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:03:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161004AbWAKHDD (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:03:03 -0500 Received: from 167.imtp.Ilyichevsk.Odessa.UA ([195.66.192.167]:49121 "HELO ilport.com.ua") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1161055AbWAKHDA (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:03:00 -0500 From: Denis Vlasenko To: Kalin KOZHUHAROV Subject: Re: 2.6.15 and CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:01:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601110901.57718.vda@ilport.com.ua> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 11 January 2006 08:34, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote: > I remember there was some talk about resetting the time on printk during the > boot to zero... Is that gone for 2.6.15? > > I recently turned CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME on two machines and they identically > print things like this: > > [17179569.184000] Linux version 2.6.15-K01_PIII_laptop (kalin@ss) (gcc > version 3.4.4 (Gentoo 3.4.4-r1, ssp-3.4.4-1.0, pie-8.7.8)) #2 PREEMPT Wed > Jan 11 09:56:21 JST 2006 > [17179569.184000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map: > [17179569.184000] BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable) > [17179569.184000] BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved) > [17179569.184000] BIOS-e820: 00000000000e0000 - 00000000000eee00 (reserved) > [17179569.184000] BIOS-e820: 00000000000eee00 - 00000000000ef000 (ACPI NVS) > [17179569.184000] BIOS-e820: 00000000000ef000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) > > ... > > [17179591.768000] ReiserFS: hda5: checking transaction log (hda5) > [17179591.836000] ReiserFS: hda5: Using r5 hash to sort names > [17179605.172000] e100: eth0: e100_watchdog: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex > > That is about t0 + 200 days :-) No, the box is not THAT slow :-D > > Now, on two different boxen, the initial time is the same: 17179569.184000 > > What is this number? I guess time sybsystem is not up until that line. -- vda