From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161324AbWAMBAX (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:00:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161335AbWAMBAX (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:00:23 -0500 Received: from oracle.bridgewayconsulting.com.au ([203.56.14.38]:36240 "EHLO oracle.bridgewayconsulting.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161324AbWAMBAW (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:00:22 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:00:10 +0800 From: Bernard Blackham To: Pavel Machek Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Nigel Cunningham , kernel list Subject: Re: Place for userland swsusp parts Message-ID: <20060113010010.GG4459@blackham.com.au> References: <20060111221511.GA8223@elf.ucw.cz> <200601120819.42512.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> <20060112143851.GB9752@elf.ucw.cz> <200601122113.24461.rjw@sisk.pl> <20060113002138.GE10088@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060113002138.GE10088@elf.ucw.cz> Organization: Dagobah Systems User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:21:38AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > IMHO uswsusp.sf.net would be too similar to swsusp.sf.net, especially that > > swsusp.sf.net is redirected to www.suspend2.net. I can put a "were you looking for uswsusp.sf.net?" on the suspend2 page if it came from swsusp.sf.net :) > Or maybe we can get hosting on suspend2.net? suspend2.net's bandwidth isn't too cheap, so most of the web traffic is funneled out to mirrors. Getting mirrors to update vhosts can take some time. sf.net would probably be quicker! Bernard. -- Bernard Blackham