public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mita@miraclelinux.com (Akinobu Mita)
To: ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] changes about Call Trace:
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:16:11 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060116121611.GA539@miraclelinux.com> (raw)

Hello,

I realized two things when I was porting my small script oops2line
to x86-64. (read call trace, find correspondance modules, calculate addr
and addr2line)

If I'm missing something, please let me know.

a) On x86-64 we get different Call Trace format than other architectures
   when we get oops or press SysRq-t:

   <ffffffffa008ef6c>{:jbd:kjournald+1030}

   There is a architecture independent function print_symbol().
   How about using it on x86-64? But it changes to:

   [<ffffffffa008ef6c>] kjournald+0x406/0x578 [jbd]

b) I can't find useful usage for the symbol size in print_symbol().
   And symbolsize seems to be fixed when vmlinux or modules are compiled.
   So we can calculate it from vmlinux or modules.
   How about removing the field of symbolsize in print_symbol()?

   [<ffffffffa008ef6c>] kjournald+0x406 [jbd]


             reply	other threads:[~2006-01-16 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-16 12:16 Akinobu Mita [this message]
2006-01-16 12:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] makes print_symbol() return int Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 14:16   ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-16 14:24     ` Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 15:18       ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-16 12:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] use usual call trace format on x86-64 Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 12:22   ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-16 12:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-01-16 12:46       ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-16 12:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] omit symbol size field in print_symbol() Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 12:22   ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-16 14:37   ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-16 15:51     ` Akinobu Mita
2006-01-17  7:06     ` Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 12:22 ` [PATCH 0/3] changes about Call Trace: Andi Kleen
2006-01-16 13:41   ` Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 13:41     ` Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 13:42     ` Akinobu Mita
2006-01-16 22:22     ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-17 16:53       ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-17  7:05   ` Akinobu Mita

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060116121611.GA539@miraclelinux.com \
    --to=mita@miraclelinux.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox