From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>,
Keith Owens <kaos@sgi.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Notifier chain update
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:01:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060118220122.GH16285@kvack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0601181656430.4974-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:57:30PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> Sez who? If it's not documented in the kernel source, I don't believe
> it.
The notifier interface is supposed to be *light weight*. Adding locks
that get taken on every call basically changes the concept entirely. The
cache misses notifiers add are measurable overhead, with locks being far
worse.
-ben
--
"You know, I've seen some crystals do some pretty trippy shit, man."
Don't Email: <dont@kvack.org>.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-18 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-18 16:34 [PATCH 1/8] Notifier chain update Alan Stern
2006-01-18 18:19 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-01-18 20:23 ` Alan Stern
2006-01-18 21:42 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-01-18 21:57 ` Alan Stern
2006-01-18 22:00 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-18 22:04 ` Alan Stern
2006-01-18 23:06 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-19 3:33 ` Alan Stern
2006-01-18 22:01 ` Benjamin LaHaise [this message]
2006-01-18 22:09 ` Alan Stern
2006-01-18 22:15 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-01-19 10:01 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-01-18 22:18 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-18 22:18 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-01-18 23:07 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-19 9:55 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060118220122.GH16285@kvack.org \
--to=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kaos@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox