From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/base/: proper prototypes
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 19:35:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060119033532.GA16518@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060119032808.GJ19398@stusta.de>
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 04:28:08AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:51:47PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 02:32:42AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > This patch contains the following changes:
> > > - move prototypes to base.h
> > > - sys.c should #include "base.h" for getting the prototype of it's
> > > global function system_bus_init()
> > >
> > > Note that hidden in this patch there's a bugfix:
> > >
> > > Caller and callee disagreed regarding the return type of
> > > sysdev_shutdown().
> > >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > drivers/base/base.h | 6 ++++++
> > > drivers/base/power/resume.c | 3 +--
> > > drivers/base/power/shutdown.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/base/power/suspend.c | 3 +--
> > > drivers/base/sys.c | 2 ++
> > > 5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --- linux-2.6.16-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/base/base.h.old 2006-01-18 23:17:52.000000000 +0100
> > > +++ linux-2.6.16-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/base/base.h 2006-01-18 23:41:33.000000000 +0100
> > > @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> > >
> > > /* initialisation functions */
> > >
> > > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > > +
> >
> > Why is this extra #include needed? It shouldn't be.
>
> struct class_device and struct class_device_attribute are needed since
> they are used in base.h .
But anyone who includes base.h will have already included this header
file, right? That was my point.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-19 3:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-19 1:32 [2.6 patch] drivers/base/: proper prototypes Adrian Bunk
2006-01-19 2:51 ` Greg KH
2006-01-19 3:28 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-19 3:35 ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-01-19 3:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-19 4:07 ` Greg KH
2006-01-19 16:30 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060119033532.GA16518@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox