From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161454AbWASWEL (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:04:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161451AbWASWEL (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:04:11 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:43143 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161450AbWASWEJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:04:09 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:05:25 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Nick Piggin Cc: npiggin@suse.de, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] sg: simplify page_count manipulations Message-Id: <20060119140525.223a8ebf.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060119144548.GF958@wotan.suse.de> References: <20060118155242.GB28418@wotan.suse.de> <20060118195937.3586c94f.akpm@osdl.org> <20060119144548.GF958@wotan.suse.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:59:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Nick Piggin wrote: > > > - /* N.B. correction _not_ applied to base page of each allocation */ > > > - for (k = 0; k < rsv_schp->k_use_sg; ++k, ++sg) { > > > - for (m = PAGE_SIZE; m < sg->length; m += PAGE_SIZE) { > > > - page = sg->page; > > > - if (startFinish) > > > - get_page(page); > > > - else { > > > - if (page_count(page) > 0) > > > - __put_page(page); > > > - } > > > - } > > > - } > > > -} > > > > What on earth is the above trying to do? The inner loop is a rather > > complex way of doing atomic_add(&page->count, sg->length/PAGE_SIZE). One > > suspects there's a missing "[m]" in there. > > > > It does this on the first mmap of the device, in the hope that subsequent > nopage, unmaps would not free the constituent pages in the scatterlist. > But it's doing it wrongly, isn't it? Or am I completely nuts?