public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, 76306.1226@compuserve.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: set_bit() is broken on i386?
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:38:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060120183857.188ef516.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jek6cu73jy.fsf@sykes.suse.de>

Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
>
> Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 19:53 -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> >
> >> #define ADDR (*(volatile long *) addr)
> >> static inline void set_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long * addr)
> >> {
> >> 	__asm__ __volatile__( "lock ; "
> >> 		"btsl %1,%0"
> >> 		:"=m" (ADDR)
> >> 		:"Ir" (nr));
> >> }
> >
> > The asm needs a memory clobber in order to avoid reordering with the
> > assignment to b[1]:
> 
> Check out 2.6.16-rc1, this has already been fixed.
> 

No, that doesn't fix this testcase.

We need to somehow tell the compiler "this assembly statement altered
memory and you can't cache memory contents across it".  That's what
"memory" (ie: barrier()) does.  I don't think there's a way of telling gcc
_what_ memory was clobbered - just "all of memory".

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-21  2:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-21  0:53 set_bit() is broken on i386? Chuck Ebbert
2006-01-21  1:15 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-01-21  1:49   ` Andreas Schwab
2006-01-21  2:38     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-01-21 19:26       ` Trond Myklebust
2006-01-21  1:32 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-01-21  2:01   ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2006-01-21  1:48 ` Andrew Morton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-21  1:38 Kenny Simpson
2006-01-21  1:46 Kenny Simpson
2006-01-21  2:07 Kenny Simpson
2006-01-21  7:43 Chuck Ebbert
2006-01-21 20:49 Chuck Ebbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060120183857.188ef516.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=schwab@suse.de \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox