From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932225AbWATWEo (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:04:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932228AbWATWEo (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:04:44 -0500 Received: from darwin.snarc.org ([81.56.210.228]:55234 "EHLO darwin.snarc.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932225AbWATWEn (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:04:43 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:04:41 +0100 To: Ben Collins Cc: Michael Loftis , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Development tree, PLEASE? Message-ID: <20060120220440.GA22061@snarc.org> References: <1137785271.13530.10.camel@grayson> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1137785271.13530.10.camel@grayson> X-Warning: Email may contain unsmilyfied humor and/or satire. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: tab@snarc.org (Vincent Hanquez) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:27:50PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > So put me in for +1 on the current development model. I'ld like to also +1 the current development model. However I think the 2.6.X should become 2.X; the 6 is starting to be meaningless, and it's not going to be upgraded ever with the current development model. this leave 2.X.Y "namespace" to the current stable team (same development model as the 2.6.X.Y). -- Vincent Hanquez