From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000 C style badness
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:42:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060121114238.GR13429@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4807377b0601202252p5fde62dbx194006441e94666a@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 20 2006, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On 1/19/06, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 18 2006, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> > > just FYI, I have a patch for the e1000 breakage which will be out as
> > > soon as I can generate it.
> >
> > Newest -git works for me. Well sort of, I get a lot of these:
> >
> > e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog_task: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex
> > e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang
> > Tx Queue <0>
> > TDH <72>
> > TDT <e5>
> > next_to_use <e5>
> > next_to_clean <6f>
> > buffer_info[next_to_clean]
> > time_stamp <10000160a>
> > next_to_watch <72>
> > jiffies <100001e09>
> > next_to_watch.status <0>
> > e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang
> > Tx Queue <0>
> > TDH <72>
> > TDT <e5>
> > next_to_use <e5>
> > next_to_clean <6f>
> > buffer_info[next_to_clean]
> > time_stamp <10000160a>
> > next_to_watch <72>
> > jiffies <1000025da>
> > next_to_watch.status <0>
> > e1000: eth0: e1000_clean_tx_irq: Detected Tx Unit Hang
> > Tx Queue <0>
> > TDH <72>
> > TDT <e5>
> > next_to_use <e5>
> > next_to_clean <6f>
> > buffer_info[next_to_clean]
> > time_stamp <10000160a>
> > next_to_watch <72>
> > jiffies <10000357b>
> > next_to_watch.status <0>
> > NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
> > e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog_task: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex
>
> where it didn't happen with the previous driver? I guess thats a good
> thing, kinda as we made the problem more frequent, hopefully we can
> help fix it?
Sorry I thought I had mentioned, it happens with the previous driver as
well. And it's pretty annoying, I get hickups due to these network
glitches.
> you don't happen to have TSO enabled do you?
Nope.
> please reply over at netdev at vger.kernel.org with the standard set
> of information, lspci, dmesg, etc etc.
Sure.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-21 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-18 8:07 [PATCH] e1000 C style badness Jens Axboe
2006-01-18 8:37 ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-18 17:53 ` Jon Smirl
2006-01-18 18:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-18 18:20 ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-18 19:10 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-01-19 8:02 ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-21 6:52 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-01-21 11:42 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
[not found] <5wgyi-18w-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-01-18 8:56 ` Patrizio Bassi
2006-01-18 9:00 ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-18 9:02 ` Nick Piggin
2006-01-18 11:30 ` Patrizio Bassi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060121114238.GR13429@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox