From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] rcu batch tuning
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 01:12:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060126194233.GG4166@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060126193317.GD6182@us.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:33:17AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 12:11:27AM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> >
> > This patch adds new tunables for RCU queue and finished batches.
> > There are two types of controls - number of completed RCU updates
> > invoked in a batch (blimit) and monitoring for high rate of
> > incoming RCUs on a cpu (qhimark, qlowmark). By default,
> > the per-cpu batch limit is set to a small value. If
> > the input RCU rate exceeds the high watermark, we do two things -
> > force quiescent state on all cpus and set the batch limit
> > of the CPU to INTMAX. Setting batch limit to INTMAX forces all
> > finished RCUs to be processed in one shot. If we have more than
> > INTMAX RCUs queued up, then we have bigger problems anyway.
> > Once the incoming queued RCUs fall below the low watermark, the batch limit
> > is set to the default.
>
> Looks good to me! We might have to have more sophisticated adjustment
> of blimit, but starting simple is definitely the right way to go.
Yes. Once I am set up to do latency measurements, I will look at
the possible need for more sophisticated adjustment of blimit.
Thanks
Dipankar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-26 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-26 18:40 [patch 0/2] RCU: fix various latency/oom issues Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-26 18:41 ` [patch 1/2] rcu batch tuning Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-26 18:42 ` [patch 2/2] fix file counting Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-26 20:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-27 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-27 23:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-27 23:28 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-28 18:42 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-28 18:51 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-28 19:10 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-30 17:00 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-31 10:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-31 20:19 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-26 19:33 ` [patch 1/2] rcu batch tuning Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-26 19:42 ` Dipankar Sarma [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-27 19:57 Oleg Nesterov
2006-01-27 23:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-28 18:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-01-30 3:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-28 17:08 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-02-17 15:41 [PATCH 0/2] RCU updates Dipankar Sarma
2006-02-17 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] rcu batch tuning Dipankar Sarma
2006-02-17 20:33 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-02-18 8:45 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-18 9:15 ` Dipankar Sarma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060126194233.GG4166@in.ibm.com \
--to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox