From: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
To: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6.16 - sys_sched_getaffinity & hotplug
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:06:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060127230659.GA4752@sgi.com> (raw)
It appears if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is enabled, then all possible
cpus (0 .. NR_CPUS-1) are set in the cpu_possible_map on IA64.
void __init
smp_build_cpu_map (void)
{
...
for (cpu = 0; cpu < NR_CPUS; cpu++) {
ia64_cpu_to_sapicid[cpu] = -1;
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU <<<<
cpu_set(cpu, cpu_possible_map); <<<<
#endif <<<<
}
sched_getaffinity() returns the cpu_possible_map and'd with the current
task p->cpus_allowed. The default cpus_allowed is all ones.
This is causing problems for apps that use sched_get_sched_affinity()
to determine which cpus that they are allowed to run on.
The call to sched_getaffinity returns:
(from strace on a 2 cpu system with NR_CPUS = 512)
sched_getaffinity(0, 1024, { ffffffffffffffff, ffffff ...
The man page for sched_getaffinity() is ambiguous. It says:
- A set bit corresponds to a legally schedulable CPU
But it also says:
- Usually, all bits in the mask are set.
Should the following change be made to sched_getaffinity().
Index: linux/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-01-25 08:50:21.401747695 -0600
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c 2006-01-27 16:57:24.504871895 -0600
@@ -4031,7 +4031,7 @@ long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, cpumas
goto out_unlock;
retval = 0;
- cpus_and(*mask, p->cpus_allowed, cpu_possible_map);
+ cpus_and(*mask, p->cpus_allowed, cpu_online_map);
out_unlock:
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
--
Thanks
Jack Steiner (steiner@sgi.com)
next reply other threads:[~2006-01-27 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-27 23:06 Jack Steiner [this message]
2006-01-28 2:58 ` 2.6.16 - sys_sched_getaffinity & hotplug Nathan Lynch
2006-01-29 13:06 ` Jack Steiner
2006-01-28 3:14 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-28 3:42 ` Nathan Lynch
2006-01-28 4:58 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-28 5:23 ` Nathan Lynch
2006-01-28 6:40 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-28 7:04 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-28 13:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-28 16:08 ` Jack Steiner
2006-01-28 19:27 ` Nathan Lynch
2006-01-28 20:06 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-29 13:51 ` [PATCH] " Jack Steiner
2006-01-28 20:09 ` 2.6.16 " Paul Jackson
2006-01-28 20:50 ` Robert Love
2006-01-28 21:00 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-29 13:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-29 16:09 ` Robert Love
2006-01-29 17:26 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060127230659.GA4752@sgi.com \
--to=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox