public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.16 - sys_sched_getaffinity & hotplug
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:58:55 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060128025854.GA18730@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060127230659.GA4752@sgi.com>

Jack Steiner wrote:
> 
> It appears if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is enabled, then all possible
> cpus (0 .. NR_CPUS-1) are set in the cpu_possible_map on IA64.

That's too bad...


> sched_getaffinity() returns the cpu_possible_map and'd with the current
> task p->cpus_allowed. The default cpus_allowed is all ones.
> 
> This is causing problems for apps that use sched_get_sched_affinity()
> to determine which cpus that they are allowed to run on.

How?  Are these apps expecting all set bits to correspond to online
cpus?


> The call to sched_getaffinity returns:
> 
> 	(from strace on a 2 cpu system with NR_CPUS = 512)
> 	sched_getaffinity(0, 1024,  { ffffffffffffffff, ffffff ...
> 
> 
> 
> The man page for sched_getaffinity() is ambiguous. It says:
> 	- A set bit corresponds to a legally  schedulable  CPU
> 
> But it also says:
> 	- Usually, all bits in the mask are set.
> 
> 
> Should the following change be made to sched_getaffinity(). 
> 
> Index: linux/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c	2006-01-25 08:50:21.401747695 -0600
> +++ linux/kernel/sched.c	2006-01-27 16:57:24.504871895 -0600
> @@ -4031,7 +4031,7 @@ long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, cpumas
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  
>  	retval = 0;
> -	cpus_and(*mask, p->cpus_allowed, cpu_possible_map);
> +	cpus_and(*mask, p->cpus_allowed, cpu_online_map);


I don't think so.

For one, that would be mucking around with a kernel/userspace ABI, I
guess.

Additionally, it would mean that the result of sched_getaffinity would
vary with the number of online cpus in the system, which I don't think
is desirable.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-28  2:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-27 23:06 2.6.16 - sys_sched_getaffinity & hotplug Jack Steiner
2006-01-28  2:58 ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2006-01-29 13:06   ` Jack Steiner
2006-01-28  3:14 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-28  3:42   ` Nathan Lynch
2006-01-28  4:58     ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-28  5:23       ` Nathan Lynch
2006-01-28  6:40         ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-28  7:04         ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-28 13:32   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-28 16:08     ` Jack Steiner
2006-01-28 19:27     ` Nathan Lynch
2006-01-28 20:06       ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-29 13:51         ` [PATCH] " Jack Steiner
2006-01-28 20:09     ` 2.6.16 " Paul Jackson
2006-01-28 20:50       ` Robert Love
2006-01-28 21:00         ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-29 13:01         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-29 16:09           ` Robert Love
2006-01-29 17:26             ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060128025854.GA18730@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=ntl@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox