From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: steiner@sgi.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rml@novell.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.16 - sys_sched_getaffinity & hotplug
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:23:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060128052355.GC18730@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060127205834.b5821a02.pj@sgi.com>
Paul Jackson wrote:
> Nathan wrote:
> > Which is problematic, because cpuset_cpus_allowed ->
> > guarantee_online_cpus restricts the task->cpus_allowed mask to cpus
> > which happen to be online at the time of the call to
> > sched_setaffinity. If more cpus come online later, that task can't be
> > migrated to them.
>
> Well, sort of.
>
> A task could always migrate - just because a sched_getaffinity
> the task did in the past doesn't show a CPU as valid, doesn't stop
> the task from asking to pin to that CPU now.
I was speaking of the setaffinity (not getaffinity) case -- I assumed
this was what you were referring to since I couldn't find any calls to
the cpuset code in the getaffinity path.
> One of three lessons could be taken from your example:
> 1) return all possible CPUS (CPU_MASK_ALL, likely), as you
> recommend
I'm only recommending not changing the current behavior of
sched_getaffinity.
(BTW - cpu_possible_map can be a subset of CPU_MASK_ALL on some
platforms -- powerpc, at least, since we can discover the number of
truly possible cpus early in boot.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-28 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-27 23:06 2.6.16 - sys_sched_getaffinity & hotplug Jack Steiner
2006-01-28 2:58 ` Nathan Lynch
2006-01-29 13:06 ` Jack Steiner
2006-01-28 3:14 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-28 3:42 ` Nathan Lynch
2006-01-28 4:58 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-28 5:23 ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2006-01-28 6:40 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-28 7:04 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-28 13:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-28 16:08 ` Jack Steiner
2006-01-28 19:27 ` Nathan Lynch
2006-01-28 20:06 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-29 13:51 ` [PATCH] " Jack Steiner
2006-01-28 20:09 ` 2.6.16 " Paul Jackson
2006-01-28 20:50 ` Robert Love
2006-01-28 21:00 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-29 13:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-29 16:09 ` Robert Love
2006-01-29 17:26 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060128052355.GC18730@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ntl@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rml@novell.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox