From: "Justin M. Forbes" <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>
To: Chuck Wolber <chuckw@quantumlinux.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] 2.6.14.7 -stable review
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 22:43:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060129044307.GA23553@linuxtx.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0601282028210.7205@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 08:30:25PM -0800, Chuck Wolber wrote:
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong here, but aren't we supposed to stop doing
> this for the 2.6.14 release now that 2.6.15 is out?
>
I don't see a problems with doing additional stable releases for any
kernel, I just wouldn't commit to supporting any specific number of
releases. Basically if people send enough patches to warrant a
review/release there is obviously some interest. What is the harm?
Justin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-29 4:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060128015840.722214000@press.kroah.org>
2006-01-28 2:17 ` [patch 0/6] 2.6.14.7 -stable review Greg KH
2006-01-28 2:18 ` [patch 1/6] setting irq affinity is broken in ia32 with MSI enabled Greg KH
2006-01-28 2:18 ` [patch 2/6] [EBTABLES] Don't match tcp/udp source/destination port for IP fragments Greg KH
2006-01-28 2:18 ` [patch 3/6] [SPARC64]: Fix ptrace/strace Greg KH
2006-01-28 2:18 ` [patch 4/6] [SPARC64]: Fix sys_fstat64() entry in 64-bit syscall table Greg KH
2006-01-28 2:18 ` [patch 5/6] [NETFILTER]: Fix crash in ip_nat_pptp (CVE-2006-0036) Greg KH
2006-01-28 2:18 ` [patch 6/6] [NETFILTER]: Fix another crash in ip_nat_pptp (CVE-2006-0037) Greg KH
2006-02-08 12:35 ` Holger Eitzenberger
2006-02-10 4:47 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2006-02-10 4:57 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 5:08 ` Greg KH
2006-02-10 8:07 ` Harald Welte
2006-01-29 4:30 ` [patch 0/6] 2.6.14.7 -stable review Chuck Wolber
2006-01-29 4:43 ` Justin M. Forbes [this message]
2006-01-29 4:52 ` Chuck Wolber
2006-01-29 4:57 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-29 5:34 ` Greg KH
2006-01-29 6:09 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-01-29 7:36 ` Chuck Wolber
2006-01-29 7:11 ` Chuck Wolber
2006-01-29 7:58 ` Chuck Wolber
2006-01-29 4:45 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-29 5:02 ` Chuck Wolber
2006-01-29 6:17 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-01-29 7:43 ` Chuck Wolber
2006-01-31 15:05 ` Krzysztof Halasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060129044307.GA23553@linuxtx.org \
--to=jmforbes@linuxtx.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=chuckw@quantumlinux.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox