public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sander <sander@humilis.net>
To: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Cc: Sander <sander@humilis.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [OT] 8-port AHCI SATA Controller?
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:50:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060131185007.GD6178@favonius> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060131184428.GJ18970@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>

Lennart Sorensen wrote (ao):
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 07:39:29PM +0100, Sander wrote:
> > Not sure about the two port, but for example the SX8 is 180 dollars at
> > pricewatch.com, while an Areca 12-port starts at 756 dollars. That is
> > 22.5 dollars per port vs 63 dollars per port. More or less the same goes
> > for 3Ware.
> 
> Hmm, well the 24 port is listed at 1278, so less per port than the 12
> port for sure, but if you only need 8, then well... :)

Actually, I need 24 ports :-)  But 3x SX8 sets me back 540 dollars
according to pricewatch, which is less than half.

> Of course I doubt there is that big a market for an 8 port NON raid
> card, which might explain why there doesn't seem to be any. Of course
> if there aren't any it is hard to have a market exist for them.

True.

> > Of course you can't compare Areca/3Ware with the SX8 feature-wise, but
> > all I need JBOD.
> 
> Well personally I have never seen more than 4 ports per card on a non
> hardware raid card.  That doesn't mean they don't exist, but it makes
> it a lot less likely that they exist in my book. :)

Fakeraid controllers are less expensive, and would do too of course :-)

-- 
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-31 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-31 11:53 [OT] 8-port AHCI SATA Controller? Sander
2006-01-31 16:39 ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-01-31 17:17   ` Sander
2006-01-31 18:30     ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-01-31 18:39       ` Sander
2006-01-31 18:44         ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-01-31 18:50           ` Sander [this message]
2006-01-31 18:58             ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-01-31 20:48               ` Roger Heflin
2006-02-01 10:15                 ` Sander
2006-02-01 14:53                   ` Roger Heflin
2006-02-01 10:03               ` Sander
2006-01-31 18:40       ` Joel Jaeggli
2006-01-31 18:51         ` Sander
2006-01-31 18:19 ` Joshua Kugler
2006-01-31 18:56   ` Sander
2006-01-31 19:02     ` Joshua Kugler
2006-02-01 10:18       ` Sander
2006-01-31 20:38     ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-31 20:48       ` Joshua Kugler
2006-01-31 20:59         ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-31 21:31           ` Joshua Kugler
2006-02-01 16:13   ` Bill Davidsen
2006-02-01 19:15     ` Joshua Kugler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060131185007.GD6178@favonius \
    --to=sander@humilis.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox