Re: + cpufreq-_ppc-frequency-change-issues-freq-already-lowered-by-bios.patch added to -mm tree

Re: + cpufreq-_ppc-frequency-change-issues-freq-already-lowered-by-bios.patch added to -mm tree

[Dave Jones]

On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:14:32PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
 > 
 > The patch titled
 > 
 >      cpufreq: _PPC frequency change issues - freq already lowered by BIOS
 > 
 > has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
 > 
 >      cpufreq-_ppc-frequency-change-issues-freq-already-lowered-by-bios.patch
 > 
 > See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
 > out what to do about this
 > 

*puzzled look*

I merged this into cpufreq-git last week.

diff-tree 0961dd0... (from c70ca00...)
Author: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Date:   Thu Jan 26 18:46:33 2006 +0100

    [CPUFREQ] _PPC frequency change issues



Did your pull fail for some reason? 

		Dave

Re: + cpufreq-_ppc-frequency-change-issues-freq-already-lowered-by-bios.patch added to -mm tree

[Thomas Renninger]

Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:14:32PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>  > 
>  > The patch titled
>  > 
>  >      cpufreq: _PPC frequency change issues - freq already lowered by BIOS
>  > 
>  > has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
>  > 
>  >      cpufreq-_ppc-frequency-change-issues-freq-already-lowered-by-bios.patch
>  > 
>  > See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
>  > out what to do about this
>  > 
> 
> *puzzled look*
> 
> I merged this into cpufreq-git last week.
> 
> diff-tree 0961dd0... (from c70ca00...)
> Author: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
> Date:   Thu Jan 26 18:46:33 2006 +0100
> 
>     [CPUFREQ] _PPC frequency change issues
> 
> 
> 
> Did your pull fail for some reason? 
> 
> 		Dave

I got this answer from Andrew, maybe he also picked up the patch
from cpufreq list?:
____________
This generates 100% rejects against the current cpufreq tree.  I'd suggest
that you prepare patches against latest -mm, which includes
git-cpufreq.patch.

Please also include the required Signed-off-by: tags, as per section 11 of
Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
____________

The patch needs a (!policy->cur) check for some cpufreq drivers, shall I resend
the whole patch with this one added or is the "ontop" patch I answered to 
avuton@gmail.com (Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-mm4) enough?

     Thomas

Re: + cpufreq-_ppc-frequency-change-issues-freq-already-lowered-by-bios.patch added to -mm tree

[Dave Jones]

On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:11:08PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
 > >Did your pull fail for some reason? 
 > >
 > >		Dave
 > 
 > I got this answer from Andrew, maybe he also picked up the patch
 > from cpufreq list?:
 > ____________
 > This generates 100% rejects against the current cpufreq tree.

Ah, that's because I changed the indentation slightly when I merged it.

 > The patch needs a (!policy->cur) check for some cpufreq drivers, shall I 
 > resend
 > the whole patch with this one added or is the "ontop" patch I answered to 
 > avuton@gmail.com (Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Re: 2.6.16-rc1-mm4) enough?

The 'ontop' is enough probably (I'm having a 'heavy' email day, so I've not
got to it yet).

		Dave