From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, dgc@sgi.com, steiner@sgi.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net,
ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clameter@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:37:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060206093701.GA16357@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060206012726.e3c7a537.pj@sgi.com>
* Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:
> Ingo asked:
> > what type of objects need to be spread (currently)? It seems that your
> > current focus is on filesystem related objects:
>
> In addition to the filesystem related objects called out in this
> current patch set, we also have some xfs directory and inode caches.
> An xfs patch is winding its way toward lkml that will enhance the xfs
> cache creation calls a little, so that we can pick off the particular
> slab caches we need to be able to spread, while leaving other xfs slab
> caches with the default node-local policy.
>
> > does any userspace mapped memory need to be spread
>
> I don't think so, but I am not entirely confident of my answer
> tonight. I would expect the applications I care about to place mapped
> pages by being careful to make the first access (load or store) of
> that page from a cpu on the node where they wanted that page placed.
>
> So, yes, either mostly filesystem related objects, or all such.
>
> I'm not sure which.
if that's the case, then i think the best way to express this would be
to categorize file objects into two groups: "global" (spread-out) and
"local". Since filesystem space is already categorized per-project, this
is also practical for the admin to do.
i.e. mountpoints/directories/files would get a 'locality of reference'
attribute, and whenever the VFS allocates memory related to those files,
it will do so based on the attribute. (The attribute is inherited deeper
in the hierarchy - i.e. setting a 'global' attribute for a mountpoint
makes all files within that filesystem spread-out.)
this is much cleaner i think, and easy/intuitive to configure. This
would have performance advantages over your current approach as well:
e.g. /tmp would always stay "local", in all cpusets - while with your
current patch they are spread out. Bigger applications (like databases)
would set this attribute themselves - but sysadmins would do it too, on
shared boxes.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-06 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-04 7:19 [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation Paul Jackson
2006-02-04 7:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] cpuset memory spread page cache implementation and hooks Paul Jackson
2006-02-04 23:49 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 1:42 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-05 1:54 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 3:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-05 5:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 6:08 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-05 6:15 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 6:28 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 0:20 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 5:51 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 7:14 ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-02-06 7:42 ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-02-06 7:51 ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-02-06 17:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-02-04 7:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] cpuset memory spread slab cache implementation Paul Jackson
2006-02-04 23:49 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 3:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-04 7:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] cpuset memory spread slab cache optimizations Paul Jackson
2006-02-04 23:50 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 3:18 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-04 23:50 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 4:10 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-04 7:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] cpuset memory spread slab cache hooks Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 4:37 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-04 23:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 3:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 4:33 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 5:50 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 6:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 6:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 7:22 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 7:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 8:19 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 8:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 8:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 9:03 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 9:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 9:27 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 9:37 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-02-06 20:22 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 8:47 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 8:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 9:09 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 10:09 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 10:16 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 10:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 10:35 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 14:42 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 14:35 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 16:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 17:11 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 18:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 18:36 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 18:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 18:48 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 19:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 20:27 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 18:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 20:01 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 20:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 20:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 20:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 20:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 21:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 22:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 23:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 23:45 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-07 0:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-07 1:17 ` David Chinner
2006-02-07 9:31 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 11:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-07 12:14 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-07 12:43 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 12:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-07 13:14 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 14:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-07 14:23 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 17:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:29 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 17:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:28 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 17:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:51 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 17:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:26 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-04 23:50 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-04 23:57 ` David S. Miller
2006-02-06 4:37 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 6:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 6:56 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 7:08 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-06 8:22 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 8:35 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 9:32 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-06 9:57 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 9:18 ` Simon Derr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060206093701.GA16357@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox