From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: OOM behavior in constrained memory situations
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:23:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200602071023.39222.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0602061745480.20189@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 02:55, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> I just tried to oom a process that has restricted its mem allocation to
> node 0 using a memory policy. Instead of an OOM the system began to swap
> on node zero. The swapping is restricted to the zones passed to
> __alloc_pages. It was thus swapping node zero alone.
Thanks for doing that work. It's needed imho and was on my todo list.
> switch (pol->policy) {
> case MPOL_DEFAULT:
> break;
> Index: linux-2.6.16-rc2/include/linux/mempolicy.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc2.orig/include/linux/mempolicy.h 2006-02-02 22:03:08.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc2/include/linux/mempolicy.h 2006-02-06 17:07:41.000000000 -0800
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
> struct mempolicy {
> atomic_t refcnt;
> short policy; /* See MPOL_* above */
> + gfp_t gfp_flags; /* flags ORed into gfp_flags for each allocation */
I don't think it's a good idea to add it to the struct mempolicy. I've tried to
make it as memory efficient as possibile and it would be a waste to add such
a mostly unused field. Better to pass that information around in some other way.
(in the worst case it could be a upper bit in policy, but I would prefer
function arguments I think)
The rest looks good.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-07 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-06 20:59 OOM behavior in constrained memory situations Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 21:10 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 21:22 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 22:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 22:25 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 22:30 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-07 0:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-09 23:08 ` David Gibson
2006-02-06 22:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 22:26 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 22:59 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-07 0:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 1:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 9:23 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-02-07 17:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:45 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 17:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:58 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 18:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 18:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 18:31 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 19:00 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200602071023.39222.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox