public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: OOM behavior in constrained memory situations
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:23:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200602071023.39222.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0602061745480.20189@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Tuesday 07 February 2006 02:55, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> I just tried to oom a process that has restricted its mem allocation to 
> node 0 using a memory policy. Instead of an OOM the system began to swap 
> on node zero. The swapping is restricted to the zones passed to 
> __alloc_pages. It was thus swapping node zero alone.

Thanks for doing that work. It's needed imho and was on my todo list.


>  	switch (pol->policy) {
>  	case MPOL_DEFAULT:
>  		break;
> Index: linux-2.6.16-rc2/include/linux/mempolicy.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc2.orig/include/linux/mempolicy.h	2006-02-02 22:03:08.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc2/include/linux/mempolicy.h	2006-02-06 17:07:41.000000000 -0800
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
>  struct mempolicy {
>  	atomic_t refcnt;
>  	short policy; 	/* See MPOL_* above */
> +	gfp_t gfp_flags;	/* flags ORed into gfp_flags for each allocation */

I don't think it's a good idea to add it to the struct mempolicy. I've tried to
make it as memory efficient as possibile and it would be a waste to add such
a mostly unused field. Better to pass that information around in some other way.

(in the worst case it could be a upper bit in policy, but I would prefer
function arguments I think) 

The rest looks good.

-Andi


  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-07  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-06 20:59 OOM behavior in constrained memory situations Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 21:10 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 21:22   ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 22:16     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 22:25       ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 22:30       ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-07  0:03         ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-09 23:08           ` David Gibson
2006-02-06 22:11   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-06 22:26     ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-06 22:59 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-07  0:39   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07  1:55   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07  9:23     ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-02-07 17:29       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:45         ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 17:51           ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 17:58             ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 18:10               ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 18:19               ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-07 18:31                 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 19:00                   ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200602071023.39222.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox