From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
npiggin@suse.de, mingo@elte.hu, rostedt@goodmis.org,
suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@osdl.org, Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] sched: remove smpnice
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 10:29:25 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200602081029.25530.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43E92B2B.2060105@bigpond.net.au>
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 10:20 am, Peter Williams wrote:
> Finally, the issue of whether the unacceptable side effects with
> hackbench described by Nick are still present when my patch is applied
> on top of Con's patch needs to be tested. I think that this is the only
> issue that would prevent my patch going into the main line as the other
> issues have been resolved.
Since whatever we do is a compromise, I vote we fasttrack Peter's patches. See
if they fix the hackbench regression and take it from there. They have had
reasonable testing in -mm, and the last changes he made did not significantly
change the code but fixed balancing decisions.
Cheers,
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-07 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-07 14:28 [rfc][patch] sched: remove smpnice Nick Piggin
2006-02-07 14:57 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-07 15:05 ` Nick Piggin
2006-02-07 22:15 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-07 23:11 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-07 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-08 3:28 ` Nick Piggin
2006-02-08 14:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-10 7:01 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-02-10 7:17 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-10 7:23 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-10 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-11 1:27 ` Peter Williams
2006-02-11 2:00 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-12 1:13 ` Peter Williams
2006-02-12 23:10 ` Peter Williams
2006-02-13 1:06 ` Peter Williams
2006-02-14 0:37 ` Peter Williams
2006-02-14 8:53 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-02-11 3:36 ` Peter Williams
2006-02-11 4:04 ` Peter Williams
2006-02-14 9:07 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-02-14 22:40 ` Peter Williams
2006-02-14 23:44 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-15 0:09 ` Peter Williams
2006-02-15 1:00 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-15 7:07 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-02-15 22:36 ` Peter Williams
2006-02-15 23:29 ` Peter Williams
2006-02-13 14:12 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-07 23:20 ` Peter Williams
2006-02-07 23:29 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2006-02-07 23:36 ` Martin Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200602081029.25530.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox