From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: dgc@sgi.com, steiner@sgi.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net, ak@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
clameter@sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/07] cpuset cleanup not not operators
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 10:54:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060209185418.8596.90838.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Since the test_bit() bit operator is boolean (return 0 or 1),
the double not "!!" operations needed to convert a scalar
(zero or not zero) to a boolean are not needed.
Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
---
Andrew,
Please drop the patches:
cpuset-memory-spread-basic-implementation.patch
cpuset-memory-spread-basic-implementation-fix.patch
cpuset-memory-spread-page-cache-implementation-and-hooks.patch
cpuset-memory-spread-slab-cache-implementation.patch
cpuset-memory-spread-slab-cache-optimizations.patch
cpuset-memory-spread-slab-cache-optimizations-tidy.patch
cpuset-memory-spread-slab-cache-hooks.patch
and replace with this patch set:
[PATCH v2 01/07] cpuset_cleanup_not_not_ops
[PATCH v2 02/07] cpuset_combine_atomic_inc_calls
[PATCH v2 03/07] cpuset_mem_spread_new
[PATCH v2 04/07] cpuset_mem_spread_page_cache
[PATCH v2 05/07] cpuset_mem_spread_slab_cache
[PATCH v2 06/07] cpuset_mem_spread_slab_optimize
[PATCH v2 07/07] cpuset_mem_spread_mark_some_slab_caches
Changes in patch set from first version to this version v2:
* dropped double not (!!) operators on cpuset flag bit tests
* use more optimal atomic_inc_return() calls
* change from one flag for all spreading to two
flags, one for page cache, one for slab cache
* change name of easily misused mpol_set_task_struct_flag()
to less inviting mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(), to minimize
risk someone will call on another task unsafely.
* a tidy fix and a missing EXPORT_SYMBOL, thanks to Andrew
* added xfs slab cache hooks for slab cache memory spreading
* comment anticipating other file systems may need same hooks
* further optimize kernel text size, for both NUMA and non-NUMA
cases of the page_cache_alloc*() memory spreading hooks
* comment why !in_interrupt() test needed to use memory spreading
* comment why we dont need to check that node returned from the
cpuset_mem_spread_node() is online
kernel/cpuset.c | 10 +++++-----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- 2.6.16-rc1-mm5.orig/kernel/cpuset.c 2006-02-06 23:17:44.536051878 -0800
+++ 2.6.16-rc1-mm5/kernel/cpuset.c 2006-02-06 23:37:02.709481506 -0800
@@ -114,27 +114,27 @@ typedef enum {
/* convenient tests for these bits */
static inline int is_cpu_exclusive(const struct cpuset *cs)
{
- return !!test_bit(CS_CPU_EXCLUSIVE, &cs->flags);
+ return test_bit(CS_CPU_EXCLUSIVE, &cs->flags);
}
static inline int is_mem_exclusive(const struct cpuset *cs)
{
- return !!test_bit(CS_MEM_EXCLUSIVE, &cs->flags);
+ return test_bit(CS_MEM_EXCLUSIVE, &cs->flags);
}
static inline int is_removed(const struct cpuset *cs)
{
- return !!test_bit(CS_REMOVED, &cs->flags);
+ return test_bit(CS_REMOVED, &cs->flags);
}
static inline int notify_on_release(const struct cpuset *cs)
{
- return !!test_bit(CS_NOTIFY_ON_RELEASE, &cs->flags);
+ return test_bit(CS_NOTIFY_ON_RELEASE, &cs->flags);
}
static inline int is_memory_migrate(const struct cpuset *cs)
{
- return !!test_bit(CS_MEMORY_MIGRATE, &cs->flags);
+ return test_bit(CS_MEMORY_MIGRATE, &cs->flags);
}
/*
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373
next reply other threads:[~2006-02-09 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-09 18:54 Paul Jackson [this message]
2006-02-09 18:54 ` [PATCH v2 02/07] cpuset use combined atomic_inc_return calls Paul Jackson
2006-02-09 19:23 ` Michael Buesch
2006-02-09 21:07 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-09 18:54 ` [PATCH v2 03/07] cpuset memory spread basic implementation Paul Jackson
2006-02-09 18:54 ` [PATCH v2 04/07] cpuset memory spread page cache implementation and hooks Paul Jackson
2006-02-09 18:54 ` [PATCH v2 05/07] cpuset memory spread slab cache implementation Paul Jackson
2006-02-09 18:54 ` [PATCH v2 06/07] cpuset memory spread slab cache optimizations Paul Jackson
2006-02-09 18:54 ` [PATCH v2 07/07] cpuset memory spread slab cache hooks Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060209185418.8596.90838.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox