public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brandon Low <lostlogic@lostlogicx.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Athlon 64 X2 cpuinfo oddities
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 20:53:22 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060213025322.GW4394@lostlogicx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73r77gx36u.fsf@verdi.suse.de>

Did the patch that fixes the out of sync cpufreq messages make it into
2.6.15 stable series?  I just acquired an athlon 64 x2 system, and was
having this:

Feb 12 15:33:33 [kernel] powernow-k8: error - out of sync, fix 0xa 0x2,
vid 0xa 0xa
Feb 12 15:33:59 [kernel] init_special_inode: bogus i_mode (300)
Feb 12 15:33:59 [kernel] ReiserFS: hda8: warning: vs-13075:
reiserfs_read_locked_inode: dead inode read from disk [283239 150550 0x0
SD]. This is likely to be race with knfsd. Ignore

Some filesystem corruptions have occurred as a result.  I'm testing
2.6.16-rc2 under the exact same conditions currently, and so far, no
errors.

Thanks,

Brandon Low


On Tue, 01/10/06 at 02:49:13 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> writes:
> > 
> > Well, first of all you'll notice that the second core shows a
> > "physical id" of 127 while the first core shows an id of 0.  Shouldn't
> > the second core be id 1, just like the "core id" fields are 0 & 1?
> 
> In theory it could be an uninitialized phys_proc_id (0xff >> 1), 
> but it could be also the BIOS just setting the local APIC of CPU 1
> to 0xff for some reason.
> 
> If you add a printk("PHYSCPU %d %x\n", smp_processor_id(), phys_proc_id[smp_processor_id()])
> at the end of arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c:early_identify_cpu() what does
> dmesg | grep PHYSCPU output?
> 
> > 
> > Second thing I find slightly odd is the lack of "sse3" in the "flags" list.
> > I was under the impression that all AMD Athlon 64 X2 CPU's featured SSE3?
> > Is it a case of:
> >  a) Me being wrong, not all Athlon 64 X2's feature SSE3?
> >  b) The CPU actually featuring SSE3 but Linux not taking advantage of it?
> >  c) The CPU features SSE3 and it's being utilized, but /proc/cpuinfo
> > doesn't show that fact?
> >  d) Something else?
> 
> It's called pni (prescott new instructions) for historical reasons. We added
> the bit too early before Intel's marketing department could make up its
> mind fully, so Linux is stuck with the old codename.
> 
> -Andi
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-13  2:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-09 20:18 Athlon 64 X2 cpuinfo oddities Jesper Juhl
2006-01-09 20:29 ` Dave Dillow
2006-01-09 22:49   ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-09 21:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-01-09 22:32   ` Edmondo Tommasina
2006-01-09 22:41     ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-09 22:49       ` Edmondo Tommasina
2006-01-10  1:49 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-10  2:12   ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-10  2:36     ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-10  9:29       ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-10 20:23         ` 64-bit vs 32-bit userspace/kernel benchmark? Was: " Jeffrey Hundstad
2006-01-10 20:34           ` 64-bit vs 32-bit userspace/kernel benchmark? Was: Athlon 64 X2 cpuinfooddities David Lang
2006-01-10 20:50             ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2006-01-10 20:53               ` 64-bit vs 32-bit userspace/kernel benchmark? Was: Athlon 64 X2cpuinfooddities David Lang
2006-01-10 20:55           ` 64-bit vs 32-bit userspace/kernel benchmark? Was: Athlon 64 X2 cpuinfo oddities Andi Kleen
2006-01-11  0:15           ` Ken Moffat
2006-02-13  2:53   ` Brandon Low [this message]
2006-02-13  3:00     ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-02-13  9:20     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060213025322.GW4394@lostlogicx.com \
    --to=lostlogic@lostlogicx.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox