From: Nicolas George <nicolas.george@ens.fr>
To: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Filesystem for mobile hard drive
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:18:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060213171814.GA22068@clipper.ens.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F0AC38.9090409@cfl.rr.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2062 bytes --]
Le quintidi 25 pluviôse, an CCXIV, Phillip Susi a écrit :
> Ahh, I see. I've never seen anyone use it in conjunction with an si
> prefix. I also think that they use it in RFCs because at the time they
> started writing them, bytes were not always 8 bits on all machines.
> Today it is a pretty safe assumption that a byte is 8 bits, so most
> people use the two terms interchangeably ;)
They continue using more octet than bytes even in recent RFCs. I have read I
do not remember where that the goal was to avoid byte/bit confusion.
I am sorry, I did not intend to start an off-topic subthread. I think I
should stick with kB/MB/GB unless I already used the full word earlier.
> I had that same thought a few weeks ago so I gave it a try. I formatted
> a partition with UDF, put some files on it, then booted windows to see
> if it would take it. It didn't :(
So bad... Perhaps it was asking too much...
> Hrm... interesting, I wonder how complete it is and what it's license
> is?
The man page (<URL:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5166/6mbb1kq22?a=view > for Solaris 10,
I believe OpenSolaris is based on it) tells briefly that the checked
inconsistencies are (I quote):
- Blocks claimed by more than one file or the free list
- Blocks claimed by a file or the free list outside the range of the file system
- Incorrect link counts in file entries
- Incorrect directory sizes
- Bad file entry format
- Blocks not accounted for anywhere
- Directory checks, file pointing to unallocated file entry and absence of a
parent directory entry
- Descriptor checks, more blocks for files than there are in the file system
- Bad free block list format
- Total free block count incorrect
I do not know UDF at all, so I can not tell if this is enough or not.
As for the licence, it is the one of OpenSolaris <URL:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/licensing/opensolaris_license/ >, which is
free enough for the FSF to make efforts to have GPL3 compatible with it.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 185 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-13 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-12 15:03 Filesystem for mobile hard drive Nicolas George
2006-02-13 0:46 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-13 1:07 ` Nicolas George
2006-02-13 2:26 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-13 8:59 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-02-13 9:23 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2006-02-13 16:07 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-13 10:35 ` Nicolas George
2006-02-13 15:56 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-13 17:18 ` Nicolas George [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060213171814.GA22068@clipper.ens.fr \
--to=nicolas.george@ens.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox