public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
To: quilt-dev@nongnu.org
Cc: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Quilt-dev] Quilt 0.43 has been released! [SERIOUS BUG]
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:10:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200602140510.54960.agruen@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F14DAA.6000703@bigpond.net.au>

On Tuesday 14 February 2006 04:25, Peter Williams wrote:
> The problem arises when pushing a patch that has errors in it (due to
> changes in the previous patches in the series) and needs the -f flag to
> force the push.  What's happening is that the reverse of the errors is
> being applied to the "pre patch" file in the .pc directory.  Then when
> you pop this patch it returns the file to a state with the reverse of
> the errors applied to it.

Found and fixed. It's a missed rollback_patch on one of the two branches of 
the code that checks if a patch can be reverse applied. This case apparently 
doesn't trigger as easily as it seems, or else we would have found it sooner. 
Still quite bad.

Shall we wait until the translations are up-to-date again, or release 0.44 
immediately?

> I'm having trouble understanding how quilt could be dumb enough to do
> this as surely the "pre patch" file in the .pc directory should be just
> a copy of the file before the patch is applied.

Hey, it's just a bug.

> This bug can completely hose a set of patches if the user doesn't notice
> it very early and do something about it.  The work around is to revert
> to version 0.42 of quilt.

You should have sent your gquilt announcement to the quilt-dev list as well. 
Thank you for summarizing the changes.

Andreas

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-14  4:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20060202230210.05a6ad4a.khali@linux-fr.org>
2006-02-14  3:25 ` [Quilt-dev] Quilt 0.43 has been released! [SERIOUS BUG] Peter Williams
2006-02-14  4:10   ` Andreas Gruenbacher [this message]
2006-02-14  4:36     ` Peter Williams
2006-02-14  8:18     ` Jean Delvare
2006-02-14 15:15       ` Yasushi SHOJI
2006-02-14 15:55         ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-02-14 22:50       ` Peter Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200602140510.54960.agruen@suse.de \
    --to=agruen@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
    --cc=quilt-dev@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox