From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
greg@kroah.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Introduce pci_set_bar_mask*()
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:07:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060215090732.GA15898@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F2C44C.7080806@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:03:56PM +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> >>This patch introduces a new interface pci_select_resource() for PCI
> >>device drivers to tell kernel what resources they want to use.
> >
> >
> >It'd be nice if we didn't need to introduce any new API functions for this.
> >If we could just do:
> >
> >struct pci_something pci_something_table[] = {
> > ...
> > {
> > ...
> > .dont_allocate_io_space = 1,
> > ...
> > },
> > ...
> >};
> >
> >within each driver which wants it.
> >
> >But I can't think of a suitable per-device-id structure with which we can
> >do that :(
> >
> >
>
> My another idea was to use pci quirks. In this approach, we don't
> need to introduce any new API. But I gave up this idea because it
> looked abuse of pci quirks.
>
> Anyway, I try to think about new ideas we don't need to introduce
> any new API.
What about pci_enable_device_bars() ?
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-15 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-14 6:03 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-14 6:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Introduce pci_set_bar_mask*() Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-15 5:07 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-15 6:03 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-15 9:07 ` Russell King [this message]
2006-02-15 12:33 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-14 6:07 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Update Documantion/pci.txt Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-14 6:09 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Make Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-14 6:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver - Make Emulex lpfc " Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-14 9:32 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] PCI legacy I/O port free driver Andi Kleen
2006-02-15 3:16 ` Kenji Kaneshige
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060215090732.GA15898@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox