public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: SMP BUG
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:20:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060216102056.GA24741@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602151521320.22082@g5.osdl.org>

On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:23:02PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Does this fix the ARM oops?

It fixes that exact oops but only by preventing us getting that far
due to another oops.

We call cpu_up, which sends a CPU_UP_PREPARE event.  This causes the
migration thread to be spawned, and rq->migration_thread to be set.

Eventually, we call the architecture __cpu_up(), which ends up
calling init_idle().  Due to this patch, init_idle() then NULLs out
rq->migration_thread.

Later, we send a CPU_ONLINE event, which then tries to do
wake_up_process(rq->migration_thread) - resulting in a NULL pointer
deref in try_to_wake_up().

Hence, with this patch, it looks like rq will be used prior to
initialisation.  I could try commenting out the migration_thread
initialisation to NULL, but I suspect that there may be other
problems associated with this patch (eg, rq->migration_queue).

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-16 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-14  0:19 SMP BUG Hubertus Franke
2006-02-15 23:07 ` Russell King
2006-02-15 23:17   ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-15 23:34     ` Russell King
2006-02-15 23:23   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-15 23:30     ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-15 23:37       ` Russell King
2006-02-15 23:46         ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-16  0:14           ` Russell King
2006-02-16  0:28             ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-16  0:52       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-16  3:29         ` Nick Piggin
2006-02-16  8:37     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-16 10:20     ` Russell King [this message]
2006-02-16 15:54       ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060216102056.GA24741@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=frankeh@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox