From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, drepper@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, arjan@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] lightweight robust futexes: -V3
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:50:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060217125054.1446958e.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060217115958.GA14938@elte.hu>
> > [ ... nice writeup of the robust-futex ABI ... ]
>
> can i put this into Documentation/robust-futex-ABI.txt?
Good idea - so be it.
Could you review it for accuracy -- I'm sure I screwed
it up in some details, large or small.
Ulrich -- if you're reading this -- your review comments
would be most welcome as well.
In particular:
1) See the description of the removal protocol, below
the XXX comment. I was really guessing there.
2) Could you add a statement on how current code should
handle the FUTEX_OWNER_PENDING bit (when to set it,
when to clear it, when to preserve it) so that current
code won't be incompatible with likely future uses of
this big?
3) You have implicit ABI versioning in the size of the
head struct. Could you add words describing that?
Thanks.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-17 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-16 9:41 [patch 0/6] lightweight robust futexes: -V3 Ingo Molnar
2006-02-16 16:33 ` Daniel Walker
2006-02-16 17:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-16 17:34 ` Daniel Walker
2006-02-16 19:06 ` [patch 0/6] lightweight robust futexes: -V3 - Why in userspace? Esben Nielsen
2006-02-16 19:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-16 20:04 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-02-16 20:17 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-02-16 20:23 ` Christopher Friesen
2006-02-16 20:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-16 22:32 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-02-16 22:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-16 23:20 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-02-16 23:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-17 0:20 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-02-17 0:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-17 23:47 ` Andrew James Wade
2006-02-16 20:23 ` [patch 0/6] lightweight robust futexes: -V3 Ingo Molnar
2006-02-16 20:54 ` Daniel Walker
2006-02-16 21:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-16 21:50 ` Christopher Friesen
2006-02-16 21:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-16 20:47 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-16 21:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-16 21:23 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-16 21:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-17 4:56 ` Paul Jackson
2006-02-17 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-17 11:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-17 20:50 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060217125054.1446958e.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox