From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
psusi@cfl.rr.com, pavel@suse.cz, torvalds@osdl.org,
mrmacman_g4@mac.com, alon.barlev@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler?
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:44:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200602192144.57748.oliver@neukum.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060219120221.1d11cee0.akpm@osdl.org>
Am Sonntag, 19. Februar 2006 21:02 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> For a), the current kernel behaviour is what we want - make the thing
> appear at a new place in the namespace and in the hierarchy. Then
> userspace can do whatever needs to be done to identify the device, and
> apply some sort of policy decision to the result.
How? If you have a running user space the connection to the open files
is already severed, as any access in that time window must fail.
For the rest we have udev.
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-19 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-12 16:57 Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? Alan Stern
2006-02-13 0:51 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-13 2:19 ` Alan Stern
2006-02-13 3:52 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-13 5:43 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-02-13 16:40 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-13 16:31 ` Alan Stern
2006-02-13 17:14 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-13 20:04 ` Alan Stern
2006-02-13 20:38 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-13 21:24 ` Alan Stern
2006-02-13 22:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-02-14 19:26 ` Alan Stern
2006-02-14 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-02-14 21:08 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-15 15:56 ` Alan Stern
2006-02-13 22:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-02-13 23:47 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-14 0:50 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-02-14 2:09 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-14 4:09 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-02-14 4:28 ` Alan Stern
2006-02-14 5:11 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-02-14 15:33 ` Alan Stern
2006-02-14 6:27 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-14 16:23 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-02-14 18:39 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-14 19:55 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-02-14 21:13 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-14 23:32 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-02-15 3:08 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-14 19:14 ` Olivier Galibert
2006-02-14 19:37 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-17 21:04 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-18 16:34 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-18 17:29 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-19 5:52 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-19 9:02 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-19 16:35 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-19 16:41 ` Alan Stern
2006-02-19 19:17 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-19 19:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-20 0:56 ` Olivier Galibert
2006-02-20 1:01 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-20 1:26 ` Olivier Galibert
2006-02-20 4:04 ` Alan Stern
2006-02-19 20:16 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-02-18 21:04 ` Alan Stern
2006-02-19 0:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-19 6:02 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-19 6:32 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-19 16:39 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-19 16:54 ` Alan Stern
2006-02-19 20:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-19 20:44 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2006-02-19 21:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-20 6:55 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-02-20 7:29 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-20 7:57 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-14 14:15 ` hackmiester / Hunter Fuller
2006-02-15 23:51 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-13 2:25 ` Kyle Moffett
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-13 19:16 David Brownell
2006-02-13 20:08 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-14 3:10 ` David Brownell
2006-02-14 6:05 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-14 17:04 ` David Brownell
2006-02-15 23:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-18 20:51 ` David Brownell
2006-02-19 6:06 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-20 5:50 ` David Brownell
2006-02-20 16:07 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-20 16:51 ` Olivier Galibert
2006-02-20 18:20 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-20 18:44 ` Olivier Galibert
2006-02-20 21:45 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-21 16:19 ` David Brownell
2006-02-21 18:30 ` Phillip Susi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200602192144.57748.oliver@neukum.org \
--to=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alon.barlev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=mrmacman_g4@mac.com \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox