public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] unexport install_page
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:13:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060221141341.GW4661@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0602211227450.8400@goblin.wat.veritas.com>

On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:49:51PM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>...
> Why's that?  It's rightly been recognized as a library function since
> 2.6.0-test3.  I'd say it should remain exported for whatever filesystems
> might wish to use it (but no, I've no vested interest, the filesystem
> you'll suspect me of arguing for does not use it ;)
> 
> <akpm@osdl.org>
>   [PATCH] export install_page() to modules
> 
>   install_page() is a library function which we expect will be used by all
>   drivers which implement vm_operations.populate().  Therefore it should be
>   exported to kernel modules.
> 
>   Petr Vandrovec has a project which involves sparse mappings of device memory
>   which can use remap_file_pages().  It needs install_page().


This export was justified in mid-2003 with a projet that would use it.

Now it's 2006, and there's still no in-kernel user.

This means it has only bloated the kernel for two and a half years 
for nearly everyone.


> Hugh

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-21 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-20 22:37 [2.6 patch] unexport install_page Adrian Bunk
2006-02-21 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-02-21 12:49   ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-21 14:13     ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-02-21 14:34       ` Alan Cox
2006-02-21 14:36         ` Adrian Bunk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-29 19:19 Adrian Bunk
2006-02-16 17:03 Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060221141341.GW4661@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox