From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
akpm@osdl.org, rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take2) - Add device_flags into pci_device_id
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:11:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060222001142.GA31605@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43FBABA4.7020906@pobox.com>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:09:08PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >On Tuesday 21 February 2006 22:55, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >
> >>It doesn't matter how easily its added, it is the wrong place to add
> >>such things.
> >>
> >>This is what the various functions called during pci_driver::probe() do...
> >
> >
> >The problem is that at least on the e1000 it only applies to some of the
> >many PCI-IDs it supports. So the original patch had an long ugly switch
> >with PCI IDs to check it. I suggested to use driver_data for it then,
> >but Kenji-San ended up with this new field. I actually like the idea
> >of the new field because it would allow to add such things very easily
> >without adding lots of code.
> >
> >it's not an uncommon situation. e.g. consider driver A which supports
> >a lot of PCI-IDs but MSI only works on a few of them. How do you
> >handle this? Add an ugly switch that will bitrot? Or put all the
> >information into a single place which is the pci_device_id array.
>
> You do what tons of other drivers do, and indicate this via driver_data.
> An enumerated type in driver_data can be used to uniquely identify any
> device or set of devices.
>
> No need to add anything.
Yes, I agree, use driver_data, it's simpler, and keeps the PCI core
clean.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-22 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-21 6:26 [PATCH 0/6] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take2) Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-21 6:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take2) - Add no_ioport flag into pci_dev Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-21 21:01 ` Greg KH
2006-02-21 6:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take2) - Fix minor bug in store_new_id() Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-21 6:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take2) - Add device_flags into pci_device_id Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-21 13:57 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-21 20:56 ` Greg KH
2006-02-21 20:59 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-21 21:10 ` Greg KH
2006-02-21 21:31 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-21 21:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-02-21 22:06 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-22 0:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-02-22 0:11 ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-02-22 2:34 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-23 2:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-02-23 6:33 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-21 6:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take2) - Update Documentation/pci.txt Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-21 6:32 ` [PATCH 5/6] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take2) - Make Intel e1000 driver legacy I/O port free Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-21 6:33 ` [PATCH 6/6] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take2) - Make Emulex lpfc " Kenji Kaneshige
2006-02-21 20:56 ` Greg KH
2006-02-23 2:34 ` [PATCH 0/6] PCI legacy I/O port free driver (take2) Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-02-23 5:58 ` Kenji Kaneshige
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060222001142.GA31605@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox