From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: Patch to reorder functions in the vmlinux to a defined order
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:20:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200602231820.50384.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602230902230.3771@g5.osdl.org>
On Thursday 23 February 2006 18:08, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > >
> > > I think you would first need to move the code first for that. Currently it starts
> > > at 1MB, which means 1MB is already wasted of the aligned 2MB TLB entry.
> > >
> > > I wouldn't have a problem with moving the 64bit kernel to 2MB though.
> >
> > that was easy since it's a Config entry already ;)
>
> Btw, the "low TLB entry" for the direct-mapped case can't be used as a
> hugetlb page anyway, due to the MMU splitting it up due to the special
> MTRR regions, if I recall correctly.
I was to suggest the same thing originally, but on several boxes I checked
there weren't any special MTRRs < 1MB, only in the PCI memory hole
<4GB. I suspect there isn't just any interesting hardware in 640K anymore.
BTW I have been also pondering some time to really trust e820 and not
forcibly reserve 640K-1MB on 64bit. That code was inherited from i386,
but probably never made too much sense
[I remember actually taking it out very early, but then putting
it back when I was hunting some insidious unrelated bug. But it wasn't that]
Perhaps that would be a good idea to ignore that newer i386 systems too
(newer defined as having DMI BIOS dates >2000 or so)
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-23 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-23 13:19 Patch to make the head.S-must-be-first-in-vmlinux order explicit Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 13:42 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 13:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 14:14 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 14:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-24 13:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-24 13:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-24 14:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-24 14:32 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 15:09 ` Patch to reorder functions in the vmlinux to a defined order Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 16:00 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 16:02 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 16:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 16:48 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 16:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 17:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-23 17:20 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-02-23 17:34 ` Alan Cox
2006-02-23 18:13 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-23 18:14 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 19:03 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-02-23 19:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-24 12:43 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-02-23 19:23 ` Rene Herman
2006-02-23 19:31 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 19:34 ` Alan Cox
2006-02-23 19:48 ` Rene Herman
2006-02-23 19:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-23 19:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 20:13 ` Rene Herman
2006-02-23 20:26 ` Dave Jones
2006-02-24 2:44 ` Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
2006-02-24 2:47 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-24 14:44 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-02-23 23:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-23 23:53 ` Rene Herman
2006-02-24 14:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-24 14:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-24 15:30 ` Rene Herman
2006-02-24 15:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-24 16:48 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-24 20:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-25 2:11 ` Folkert van Heusden
2006-02-25 8:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-24 17:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-24 17:57 ` Rene Herman
2006-02-24 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-07 23:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-02-24 14:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-24 1:38 ` Martin Bligh
2006-02-23 20:07 ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-02-23 16:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-23 16:54 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-23 18:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 16:57 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-02-23 17:36 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2006-02-23 17:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-24 22:19 ` Tony Luck
2006-02-24 22:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200602231820.50384.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox