public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: Patch to reorder functions in the vmlinux to a defined order
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:20:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200602231820.50384.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602230902230.3771@g5.osdl.org>

On Thursday 23 February 2006 18:08, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > 
> > > I think you would first need to move the code first for that. Currently it starts
> > > at 1MB, which means 1MB is already wasted of the aligned 2MB TLB entry.
> > > 
> > > I wouldn't have a problem with moving the 64bit kernel to 2MB though.
> > 
> > that was easy since it's a Config entry already ;)
> 
> Btw, the "low TLB entry" for the direct-mapped case can't be used as a 
> hugetlb page anyway, due to the MMU splitting it up due to the special 
> MTRR regions, if I recall correctly.

I was to suggest the same thing originally, but on several boxes I checked
there weren't any special MTRRs < 1MB, only in the PCI memory hole
<4GB. I suspect there isn't just any interesting hardware in 640K anymore.

BTW I have been also pondering some time to really trust e820 and not
forcibly reserve 640K-1MB on 64bit.  That code was inherited from i386,
but probably never made too much sense

[I remember actually taking it out very early, but then putting
it back when I was hunting some insidious unrelated bug. But it wasn't that]

Perhaps that would be a good idea to ignore that newer i386 systems too 
(newer defined as having DMI BIOS dates >2000 or so) 

-Andi


  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-23 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-23 13:19 Patch to make the head.S-must-be-first-in-vmlinux order explicit Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 13:42 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 13:57   ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 14:14     ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 14:40       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-24 13:49       ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-24 13:53         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-24 14:17           ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-24 14:32           ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 15:09 ` Patch to reorder functions in the vmlinux to a defined order Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 16:00   ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 16:02     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 16:43     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 16:48       ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 16:49         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 17:08       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-23 17:20         ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-02-23 17:34           ` Alan Cox
2006-02-23 18:13             ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 17:44           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-23 18:14             ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 19:03         ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-02-23 19:32           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-24 12:43             ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-02-23 19:23         ` Rene Herman
2006-02-23 19:31           ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-23 19:34           ` Alan Cox
2006-02-23 19:48             ` Rene Herman
2006-02-23 19:35           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-23 19:44             ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 20:13             ` Rene Herman
2006-02-23 20:26               ` Dave Jones
2006-02-24  2:44                 ` Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
2006-02-24  2:47                   ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-24 14:44                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-02-23 23:19               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-23 23:53                 ` Rene Herman
2006-02-24 14:23                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-24 14:23                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-24 15:30                     ` Rene Herman
2006-02-24 15:55                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-24 16:48                         ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-24 20:38                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-25  2:11                             ` Folkert van Heusden
2006-02-25  8:32                               ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-24 17:26                         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-24 17:57                           ` Rene Herman
2006-02-24 18:11                             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-07 23:36                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-02-24 14:11                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-02-24  1:38             ` Martin Bligh
2006-02-23 20:07         ` Andy Whitcroft
2006-02-23 16:48   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-02-23 16:54     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-23 18:01     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-23 16:57   ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-02-23 17:36   ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2006-02-23 17:59     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-24 22:19   ` Tony Luck
2006-02-24 22:21     ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200602231820.50384.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox