From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com>
Cc: Gautam H Thaker <gthaker@atl.lmco.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ~5x greater CPU load for a networked application when using 2.6.15-rt15-smp vs. 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:08:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060223210844.GA26701@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29495f1d0602231306o55d759d5v9600b070a4b485e3@mail.gmail.com>
* Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would it make more sense to compare 2.6.15 and 2.6.15-rt17, as opposed
> to 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4 and 2.6.15-rt17? Seems like the closer the two
> kernels are, the easier it will be to isolate the differences.
good point. I'd expect there to be similar 'top' output, but still worth
doing for comparable results.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-23 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-23 19:55 ~5x greater CPU load for a networked application when using 2.6.15-rt15-smp vs. 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4 Gautam H Thaker
2006-02-23 20:15 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-23 20:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-23 21:06 ` Nish Aravamudan
2006-02-23 21:08 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-02-23 21:14 ` Nish Aravamudan
2006-02-23 22:07 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-02-24 8:03 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-02-24 12:11 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-24 20:06 ` Gautam H Thaker
2006-02-24 20:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-24 20:44 ` Gautam H Thaker
2006-02-24 16:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-02-24 19:25 ` Gautam H Thaker
2006-02-28 19:27 ` Matt Mackall
2006-02-28 22:19 ` Gautam H Thaker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-11 18:08 Jonathan Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060223210844.GA26701@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=gthaker@atl.lmco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nish.aravamudan@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox