public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thunder7@xs4all.nl
To: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: MD Raid 6: poor algorithm choice?
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:09:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060223210915.GA2800@amd64.of.nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43FDF82A.5050201@bootc.net>

From: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
Date: Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 06:00:10PM +0000
> Hi all,
> 
> [4295106.474000] raid6: mmxx2     2500 MB/s
> [4295106.521000] raid6: sse1x2    2339 MB/s
> [4295106.524000] raid6: using algorithm sse1x2 (2339 MB/s)
> [4295106.531000] md: raid6 personality registered for level 6
> 
> I just loaded the raid6 module for fun (might end up using it one day), and 
> I was surprised at its choice of algorithm. By the messages above, I would 
> have assumed it would choose the mmxx2 algorithm at 2500 MB/s instead of 
> sse1x2 at the slightly slower 2339 MB/s. This is probably entirely expected 
> behaviour, but why?
> 
Because it is more cache-efficient (allows the other code to run at a
higher speed). This comes up now and again, perhaps these messages
should be rephrased.

Jurriaan
-- 
Uhm, well, what we are talking about in privy terms, is the very latest
in front-wall fresh air orifices combined with a wide capacity gutter
installation below.
You mean crap out of the window?
	Blackadder II
Debian (Unstable) GNU/Linux 2.6.16-rc3-mm1 5503 bogomips load load 0.01

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-23 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-23 18:00 MD Raid 6: poor algorithm choice? Chris Boot
2006-02-23 21:09 ` thunder7 [this message]
2006-02-23 21:31   ` Chris Boot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060223210915.GA2800@amd64.of.nowhere \
    --to=thunder7@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=bootc@bootc.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox