From: thunder7@xs4all.nl
To: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: MD Raid 6: poor algorithm choice?
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:09:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060223210915.GA2800@amd64.of.nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43FDF82A.5050201@bootc.net>
From: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
Date: Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 06:00:10PM +0000
> Hi all,
>
> [4295106.474000] raid6: mmxx2 2500 MB/s
> [4295106.521000] raid6: sse1x2 2339 MB/s
> [4295106.524000] raid6: using algorithm sse1x2 (2339 MB/s)
> [4295106.531000] md: raid6 personality registered for level 6
>
> I just loaded the raid6 module for fun (might end up using it one day), and
> I was surprised at its choice of algorithm. By the messages above, I would
> have assumed it would choose the mmxx2 algorithm at 2500 MB/s instead of
> sse1x2 at the slightly slower 2339 MB/s. This is probably entirely expected
> behaviour, but why?
>
Because it is more cache-efficient (allows the other code to run at a
higher speed). This comes up now and again, perhaps these messages
should be rephrased.
Jurriaan
--
Uhm, well, what we are talking about in privy terms, is the very latest
in front-wall fresh air orifices combined with a wide capacity gutter
installation below.
You mean crap out of the window?
Blackadder II
Debian (Unstable) GNU/Linux 2.6.16-rc3-mm1 5503 bogomips load load 0.01
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-23 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-23 18:00 MD Raid 6: poor algorithm choice? Chris Boot
2006-02-23 21:09 ` thunder7 [this message]
2006-02-23 21:31 ` Chris Boot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060223210915.GA2800@amd64.of.nowhere \
--to=thunder7@xs4all.nl \
--cc=bootc@bootc.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox