From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 stack trace cleanup
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:47:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200602241147.03041.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1140777679.5073.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Friday 24 February 2006 11:41, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch cleans up the clutter of x86_64 stack traces, making the
> output closer to what i386 and sparc64 stack traces look like. It uses
> print_symbol instead of resolving the symbols manually, and prints one
> frame per line instead of displaying multiple frames per line. I left
> the other stuff in the stack dump alone; this affects only the frame
> list.
>
> I know this has been brought up before
> (http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0602.0/2238.html,
> although I noticed a slight problem w/ that patch, as __print_symbol
> returns void); however, for people that don't spend all their time
> looking at x86_64 backtraces, I think this consistency shouldn't be
> scoffed at. When you switch back and forth between different archs,
> x86_64's backtrace is cluttered and confusing in comparison.
If the formatting of the oopses is your only problem you are a
lucky man.
The problem is your new format uses more screen estate, which is precious
after an oops because the VGA scrollback is so small.
That is why i rejected the earlier attempts at changing this.
I can offer you a deal though: if you fix VGA scrollback to have
at least 1000 lines by default we can change the oops formatting too.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-24 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-24 10:41 [PATCH] x86_64 stack trace cleanup Andres Salomon
2006-02-24 10:47 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-02-24 11:29 ` Andres Salomon
2006-02-24 12:22 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-24 19:25 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-02-24 19:40 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-24 13:35 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-24 12:50 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-24 13:00 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-24 13:13 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-24 13:20 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-24 15:53 ` Randy.Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200602241147.03041.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=dilinger@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox