public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: pavel@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 2/2] mm: make shrink_all_memory try harder
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:25:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200602281825.55355.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060227192532.0a71e19b.akpm@osdl.org>

On Tuesday 28 February 2006 04:25, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >
> > Make shrink_all_memory() repeat the attempts to free more memory if there
> > seems to be no pages to free.
> > 
> 
> This description doesn't describe what the problem is, not how the patch
> fixes it.  So I'm kinda left guessing.

I have described it in the 0/0 message, but I should have repeated that in the
changelog, sorry.

The probelm is that shrink_all_memory() sometimes returns 0 when there are
some freeable pages left.  In swsusp we stop freeing memory when
shrink_all_memory() returns 0, so this is a problem to us.

> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.16-rc4-mm2.orig/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ linux-2.6.16-rc4-mm2/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/cpuset.h>
> >  #include <linux/notifier.h>
> >  #include <linux/rwsem.h>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> >  
> >  #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> >  #include <asm/div64.h>
> > @@ -1793,17 +1794,24 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned
> >  	struct reclaim_state reclaim_state = {
> >  		.reclaimed_slab = 0,
> >  	};
> > +	int retry = 2;
> >  
> >  	current->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
> > -	for_each_pgdat(pgdat) {
> > -		unsigned long freed;
> > +	do {
> > +		for_each_pgdat(pgdat) {
> > +			unsigned long freed;
> >  
> > -		freed = balance_pgdat(pgdat, nr_to_free, 0);
> > -		ret += freed;
> > -		nr_to_free -= freed;
> > -		if (nr_to_free <= 0)
> > +			freed = balance_pgdat(pgdat, nr_to_free, 0);
> > +			ret += freed;
> > +			nr_to_free -= freed;
> > +			if (nr_to_free <= 0)
> > +				break;
> > +		}
> > +		if (ret > 0)
> >  			break;
> > -	}
> > +		if (retry)
> > +			msleep_interruptible(100);
> 
> TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE sleeps won't do anything if someone has sent this
> process a signal.    They should be used with caution.
> 
> 
> Something like the below, I guess.  But it's hard to fix something when you
> don't know what you're fixing.

Sorry again.

> swsusp should call drop_pagecache() and then drop_slab() before trying to
> use shrink_all_memory(), btw.

Well, sometimes we don't need to free a lot of memory.

> diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~mm-make-shrink_all_memory-try-harder mm/vmscan.c
> --- devel/mm/vmscan.c~mm-make-shrink_all_memory-try-harder	2006-02-27 19:17:29.000000000 -0800
> +++ devel-akpm/mm/vmscan.c	2006-02-27 19:21:08.000000000 -0800
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>  #include <linux/cpuset.h>
>  #include <linux/notifier.h>
>  #include <linux/rwsem.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>  #include <asm/div64.h>
> @@ -1783,11 +1784,13 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned
>  	pg_data_t *pgdat;
>  	unsigned long nr_to_free = nr_pages;
>  	unsigned long ret = 0;
> +	unsigned retry = 2;
>  	struct reclaim_state reclaim_state = {
>  		.reclaimed_slab = 0,
>  	};
>  
>  	current->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
> +repeat:
>  	for_each_pgdat(pgdat) {
>  		unsigned long freed;
>  
> @@ -1797,6 +1800,10 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned
>  		if ((long)nr_to_free <= 0)
>  			break;
>  	}
> +	if (retry-- && ret < nr_pages) {
> +		blk_congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/5);
> +		goto repeat;
> +	}

I'd like to do this only if ret is 0.

>  	current->reclaim_state = NULL;
>  	return ret;
>  }
> _
> 
> But then, the above could be implemented by the caller, so I don't know
> what's going on..

If 0 is returned, the caller assumes there are no more freeable pages.


  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-28 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-27 18:26 [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/2] mm: shrink_all_memory improvements Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-02-27 18:28 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 1/2] mm: make shrink_all_memory overflow-resistant Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-02-27 18:53   ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-27 19:02     ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-27 19:06       ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-27 23:15     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-02-28  3:16   ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-28 17:28     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-02-27 18:30 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 2/2] mm: make shrink_all_memory try harder Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-02-28  3:25   ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-28 17:25     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2006-02-28 18:46       ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-28 23:04         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-02-27 18:33 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/2] mm: shrink_all_memory improvements Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200602281825.55355.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox