From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 12:58:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060301125802.cce9ef51.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060301192103.GA14320@kroah.com>
Greg wrote:
> As reported this is expected, and can be ignored safely. It's just scsi
> being bad :)
Yeah - so I eventually realized.
> > [<a0000001001eac90>] sysfs_create_group+0x30/0x2a0
> > sp=e00002343bd97d50 bsp=e00002343bd91120
> > [<a000000100809190>] topology_cpu_callback+0x70/0xc0
> > sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910f0
> > [<a000000100809260>] topology_sysfs_init+0x80/0x120
> > sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910d0
>
> This points at the sysfs cpu patches that are in -mm, which are not in
> my tree...
So ... what does that mean for who should be looking at this?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-01 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200603010120.k211KqVP009559@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
2006-03-01 2:18 ` + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 2:36 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01 3:45 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 4:10 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 5:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01 5:25 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 6:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01 6:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01 7:20 ` [PATCH] proc: Reference couting fix Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01 7:26 ` [PATCH] proc: task_mmu bug fix Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01 7:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01 12:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01 13:14 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-03-01 13:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-01 18:33 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 7:48 ` + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 8:26 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01 8:39 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 9:53 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 10:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01 10:14 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 10:11 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 10:31 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 19:21 ` Greg KH
2006-03-01 20:58 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2006-03-01 21:30 ` Greg KH
2006-03-01 22:26 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01 22:50 ` Greg KH
2006-03-01 23:20 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 23:40 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-02 0:10 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-02 0:35 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 23:10 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 23:40 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-02 4:20 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-02 6:14 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-02 7:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-02 19:12 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-02 21:52 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-03 6:33 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-03 6:44 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01 4:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01 4:58 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060301125802.cce9ef51.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox