Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree

Paul Jackson
2006-03-01T20:58:12Z

Greg wrote:
> As reported this is expected, and can be ignored safely. It's just scsi
> being bad :)

Yeah - so I eventually realized.

> > [<a0000001001eac90>] sysfs_create_group+0x30/0x2a0
> > sp=e00002343bd97d50 bsp=e00002343bd91120
> > [<a000000100809190>] topology_cpu_callback+0x70/0xc0
> > sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910f0
> > [<a000000100809260>] topology_sysfs_init+0x80/0x120
> > sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910d0
>
> This points at the sysfs cpu patches that are in -mm, which are not in
> my tree...

So ... what does that mean for who should be looking at this?

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401