Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree

Greg KH
2006-03-01T21:30:54Z

On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:58:02PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Greg wrote:
> > As reported this is expected, and can be ignored safely. It's just scsi
> > being bad :)
>
> Yeah - so I eventually realized.
>
> > > [<a0000001001eac90>] sysfs_create_group+0x30/0x2a0
> > > sp=e00002343bd97d50 bsp=e00002343bd91120
> > > [<a000000100809190>] topology_cpu_callback+0x70/0xc0
> > > sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910f0
> > > [<a000000100809260>] topology_sysfs_init+0x80/0x120
> > > sp=e00002343bd97d60 bsp=e00002343bd910d0
> >
> > This points at the sysfs cpu patches that are in -mm, which are not in
> > my tree...
>
> So ... what does that mean for who should be looking at this?

Hm, looks like that stuff went into mainline already, sorry I thought it
was still in -mm.

Look at changeset 69dcc99199fe29b0a29471a3488d39d9d33b25fc for details.
I've cced Yanmin, who did that work.

thanks,

greg k-h