From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: pj@sgi.com, greg@kroah.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yanmin.zhang@intel.com,
Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Subject: Re: + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 20:20:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060301202058.42975408.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060301154040.a7cb2afd.pj@sgi.com>
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew wrote:
> > But Paul bisected it down to a particular not-merged patch,
> > gregkh-driver-allow-sysfs-attribute-files-to-be-pollable.patch, which I'll
> > admit doesn't look like it'll cause this.
>
> Verified.
All very strange. afaict that patch is a no-op. The changelog claims that
"This patch also uses sysfs_notify to allow /sys/block/md*/md/sync_action
to be pollable", except that part is AWOL.
It'd be interesting to see if just the data structure expansion:
--- gregkh-2.6.orig/fs/sysfs/file.c
+++ gregkh-2.6/fs/sysfs/file.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/fsnotify.h>
#include <linux/kobject.h>
#include <linux/namei.h>
+#include <linux/poll.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/semaphore.h>
@@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ struct sysfs_buffer {
struct sysfs_ops * ops;
struct semaphore sem;
int needs_read_fill;
+ int event;
};
--- gregkh-2.6.orig/include/linux/kobject.h
+++ gregkh-2.6/include/linux/kobject.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include <linux/rwsem.h>
#include <linux/kref.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
#include <asm/atomic.h>
#define KOBJ_NAME_LEN 20
@@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ struct kobject {
struct kset * kset;
struct kobj_type * ktype;
struct dentry * dentry;
+ wait_queue_head_t poll;
};
extern int kobject_set_name(struct kobject *, const char *, ...)
--- gregkh-2.6.orig/include/linux/sysfs.h
+++ gregkh-2.6/include/linux/sysfs.h
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ struct sysfs_dirent {
umode_t s_mode;
struct dentry * s_dentry;
struct iattr * s_iattr;
+ atomic_t s_event;
};
#define SYSFS_ROOT 0x0001
is sufficient to break it.
Somewhat OT, but why is that patch dinking around with the attribute's
\x10parent directory? Why not just poll the attribute's sysfs file directly?
<xenuflects>. Possibly because we want the poller to be woken when an
attribute actually gets instantiated within the directory?? Dunno.
And it's a bit sad that poll() on an unpollable attribute will just hang.
One would expect poll() to come back with -EINVAL.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-02 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200603010120.k211KqVP009559@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
2006-03-01 2:18 ` + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 2:36 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01 3:45 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 4:10 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 5:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01 5:25 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 6:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01 6:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01 7:20 ` [PATCH] proc: Reference couting fix Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01 7:26 ` [PATCH] proc: task_mmu bug fix Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01 7:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01 12:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01 13:14 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-03-01 13:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-01 18:33 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 7:48 ` + proc-dont-lock-task_structs-indefinitely-cpuset-fix-2.patch added to -mm tree Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 8:26 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01 8:39 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 9:53 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 10:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01 10:14 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 10:11 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 10:31 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 19:21 ` Greg KH
2006-03-01 20:58 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 21:30 ` Greg KH
2006-03-01 22:26 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01 22:50 ` Greg KH
2006-03-01 23:20 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 23:40 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-02 0:10 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-02 0:35 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 23:10 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-01 23:40 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-02 4:20 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-03-02 6:14 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-02 7:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-02 19:12 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-02 21:52 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-03 6:33 ` Paul Jackson
2006-03-03 6:44 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-01 4:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-01 4:58 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060301202058.42975408.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox