From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@pathscale.com>
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Define wc_wmb, a write barrier for PCI write combining
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 20:49:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200603012049.32670.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1141242206.2899.109.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 20:43, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> > Implementing the fences in the way your're suggesting would be very costly
> > because it could make them potentially stall for thousands of cycles.
>
> But it *doesn't*. On existing CPUs and systems, today, the phantom
> worse-case semantics you are conjuring up simply do not exist. If
> someone builds such an asinine system, the right approach is to handle
> it once it exists.
Normally we write code to the defined architecture.
Relying on undocumented side effects of instructions as you're trying
to do here is not very reliable and would likely cause breakage later.
Especially not for encoding it in the general Linux interface.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-01 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-25 4:20 [PATCH] Define wc_wmb, a write barrier for PCI write combining Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-25 4:43 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-25 7:34 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-25 13:28 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-25 17:20 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-25 19:01 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-28 17:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-02-28 17:50 ` Roland Dreier
2006-02-28 17:50 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-02-28 17:52 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-28 17:59 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-02-25 14:28 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-25 17:11 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-25 17:41 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-28 17:50 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-28 17:58 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-28 18:20 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-28 19:03 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-28 19:20 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-28 19:33 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-28 19:44 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-01 19:20 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-01 19:27 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-01 19:43 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-01 19:49 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-03-01 20:05 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-01 20:26 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-01 20:35 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-28 19:34 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-28 18:22 ` Christopher Friesen
2006-02-28 10:01 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-02-28 15:42 ` Roland Dreier
2006-02-28 16:08 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-02-28 17:02 ` Roland Dreier
2006-02-28 17:13 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-02-28 17:20 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-03-01 8:16 ` Jeremy Higdon
2006-03-01 8:24 ` Jeremy Higdon
2006-02-28 17:11 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-02-28 17:57 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-28 18:07 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-02-28 18:24 ` Christopher Friesen
2006-03-01 10:45 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-03-01 17:04 ` Roland Dreier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200603012049.32670.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=bos@pathscale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox