From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 17:14:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060301221404.GA1440@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1141248546.30185.44.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:29:06PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 23:33 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > It's still being kicked around. I saw one patch off-list earlier this
> > week that has some small improvements over the variant originally posted,
> > but still had 1-2 kinks.
>
> Hm... what kinks are you referring to? Anything you want me to look at?
I think Konrad was on top of it, mostly just confusion over variants
of the same diff leading to things previously fixed being dropped again.
In light of Matthew's comments in this thread though, I'm also wondering
if we can now get by without this diff, and just enable it by default now
that the kernel respects that the BIOS and leaves it alone if it's been
disabled.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-01 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-20 1:20 [PATCH] leave APIC code inactive by default on i386 Darrick J. Wong
2006-01-20 14:42 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-01 3:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2006-03-01 4:33 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-01 5:10 ` Michael Ellerman
2006-03-01 13:38 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-01 13:52 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-03-01 6:36 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2006-03-01 13:39 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-01 21:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2006-03-01 22:14 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2006-03-01 22:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2006-03-01 22:51 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-01 23:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2006-03-06 12:50 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-06 17:17 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-06 17:41 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-06 17:52 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-06 17:58 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-06 18:17 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-06 19:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060301221404.GA1440@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox