From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>,
Ren? Rebe <rene@exactcode.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:41:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060301224123.GA10422@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060301223430.GA9159@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 11:34:30PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:54:23PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:42:35PM +0100, Ren? Rebe wrote:
> > > So, queing alot URBs is the recommended way to sustain the bus? Allowing
> > > way bigger buffers will not be realistic?
> >
> > 16Kb is "way big" in the USB scheme of things aready. Look at the size
> > of your endpoint. It's probably _very_ small compared to that. So no,
> > larger buffer sizes is not realistic at all.
>
> As a data point, I have traces of a scanner session including a
> download of a 26Mb binary image using 524288 bytes logical blocks
> physically transferred with 61440 bytes bulk_in frames. Seems stable
> enough. IIRC the scanner-side controller chip has some advanced
> buffering just to handle that kind of bandwidth.
That's impressive. What are the endpoint sizes on the device that did
this?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-01 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-01 20:16 MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE René Rebe
2006-03-01 20:53 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Oliver Neukum
2006-03-01 21:32 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Greg KH
2006-03-01 21:42 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE René Rebe
2006-03-01 21:54 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Greg KH
2006-03-01 22:34 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Olivier Galibert
2006-03-01 22:41 ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-03-01 23:25 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Olivier Galibert
2006-03-01 23:37 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Greg KH
2006-03-02 9:04 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE René Rebe
2006-03-02 16:47 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Greg KH
2006-03-02 16:03 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE René Rebe
2006-03-02 16:47 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Greg KH
2006-03-01 21:59 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Duncan Sands
2006-03-03 10:34 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Oliver Neukum
[not found] ` <mailman.1141249502.22706.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2006-03-02 21:05 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Pete Zaitcev
2006-03-03 7:27 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE René Rebe
2006-03-03 20:32 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Greg KH
2006-03-03 8:12 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Duncan Sands
2006-03-03 10:29 ` MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE Oliver Neukum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060301224123.GA10422@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=galibert@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rene@exactcode.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox