From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751349AbWCBQwa (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 11:52:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751390AbWCBQwa (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 11:52:30 -0500 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:64950 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751349AbWCBQwa (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 11:52:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 08:52:17 -0800 From: Paul Jackson To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Cc: hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, Simon.Derr@bull.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proc: move proc fs hooks from cpuset.c to proc/fs/base.c Message-Id: <20060302085217.8ec38ebe.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20060302070812.15674.50176.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> <20060302084739.GC21902@infradead.org> <20060302062359.5940ff7f.pj@sgi.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.7 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Agreed. However the direction I am gradually moving fs/proc/base.c > is the opposite. Oh - ok fine. I had seen something from Andrew a couple of days ago that led me to a different understanding in this particular case. Andrew - kill this patch (unless you know better.) -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401