From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Ben Chelf <ben@coverity.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of Linux
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 00:49:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060306054959.GA21445@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <440BCA0F.50501@coverity.com>
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 09:35:11PM -0800, Ben Chelf wrote:
> Right now, we're guarding access to the actual defects that we report
> for a couple of reasons: (1) We think that you, as developers of Linux,
> should have the chance to look at the defects we find to patch them
> before random other folks get to see what we found and (2) From a
> support perspective, we want to make sure that we have the appropriate
> time to engage with those who want to use the results to fix the code.
> Because of this second point, I'd ask that if you are interested in
> really digging into the results a bit further for your project, please
> have a couple of core maintainers (or group nominated individuals) reach
> out to me to request access. As this is a new process for us and still
> involves a small number of packages, I want to make sure that I
> personally can be involved with the activity that is generated from this
> effort.
>
> So I'm basically asking for people who want to play around with some
> cool new technology to help make source code better. If this interests
> you, please feel free to reach out to me directly. And of course, if
> there are other packages you care about that aren't currently on the
> list, I want to know about those too.
The last time I asked about access to your bug list, I was asked to
sign the equivalent of a non-compete agreement. Is this still in place?
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-06 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-06 5:35 Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of Linux Ben Chelf
2006-03-06 5:49 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2006-03-06 10:27 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-03-06 10:43 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-03-06 11:03 ` Michal Schmidt
2006-03-06 11:08 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-03-06 13:39 ` Ben Chelf
2006-03-06 11:57 ` Gene Heskett
2006-03-06 12:38 ` [OT] Linux washing powder (was: Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of Linux) Michal Schmidt
2006-03-06 20:13 ` Gene Heskett
2006-03-06 13:07 ` Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of Linux Dick Streefland
2006-03-06 13:46 ` Ben Chelf
2006-03-06 15:46 ` Greg KH
2006-03-06 18:33 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-06 18:53 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-14 12:37 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2006-03-15 3:41 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060306054959.GA21445@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=ben@coverity.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox