From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
markhe@nextd.demon.co.uk, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Subject: Re: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 21:30:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060306203036.GQ4595@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603062124.42223.jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 06 2006, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Monday 06 March 2006 21:06, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >
> > > So it's either an aic7xxx bug, or it's generic SCSI.
> > >
> > > Considering that we've had other slab corruption issues (the reason I was
> > > looking closely at yours), generic SCSI isn't out of the question.
> > >
> > > If you were a git user, doing a bisection run would be useful since you
> > > seem to be able to recreate it at will. Oh, well. Testign that one patch
> > > would still help.
> >
>
> Since the patch you sent me didn't apply cleanly to the mm kernel I made the
> changes by hand. This is what I ended up with (should be the same end result
> as what you intended as far as I can see) :
>
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2-orig/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2006-03-05 23:43:56.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2006-03-06 21:13:53.000000000 +0100
> @@ -260,7 +260,6 @@ int scsi_execute(struct scsi_device *sde
> memcpy(req->cmd, cmd, req->cmd_len);
> req->sense = sense;
> req->sense_len = 0;
> - req->retries = retries;
> req->timeout = timeout;
> req->flags |= flags | REQ_BLOCK_PC | REQ_SPECIAL | REQ_QUIET;
>
> @@ -478,7 +477,6 @@ int scsi_execute_async(struct scsi_devic
> req->sense = sioc->sense;
> req->sense_len = 0;
> req->timeout = timeout;
> - req->retries = retries;
> req->end_io_data = sioc;
>
> sioc->data = privdata;
> @@ -1240,7 +1238,7 @@ static void scsi_setup_blk_pc_cmnd(struc
> cmd->sc_data_direction = DMA_FROM_DEVICE;
>
> cmd->transfersize = req->data_len;
> - cmd->allowed = req->retries;
> + cmd->allowed = 3;
> cmd->timeout_per_command = req->timeout;
> cmd->done = scsi_blk_pc_done;
> }
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2-orig/block/scsi_ioctl.c 2006-03-05 23:43:41.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2/block/scsi_ioctl.c 2006-03-06 21:16:19.000000000 +0100
> @@ -314,8 +314,6 @@ static int sg_io(struct file *file, requ
> if (!rq->timeout)
> rq->timeout = BLK_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT;
>
> - rq->retries = 0;
> -
> start_time = jiffies;
>
> /* ignore return value. All information is passed back to caller
> @@ -433,7 +431,6 @@ static int sg_scsi_ioctl(struct file *fi
> rq->data = buffer;
> rq->data_len = bytes;
> rq->flags |= REQ_BLOCK_PC;
> - rq->retries = 0;
>
> blk_execute_rq(q, bd_disk, rq, 0);
> err = rq->errors & 0xff; /* only 8 bit SCSI status */
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2-orig/include/linux/blkdev.h 2006-03-05 23:44:06.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc5-mm2/include/linux/blkdev.h 2006-03-06 21:13:02.000000000 +0100
> @@ -190,7 +190,6 @@ struct request {
> void *sense;
>
> unsigned int timeout;
> - int retries;
>
> /*
> * For Power Management requests
>
>
> Unfortunately that didn't fix it. After booting the patched kernel I found
> this in dmesg :
I don't see how it could be, honestly, we would gladly oops in locally
close places if that was the case. If you disable slab debug/poison, do
you get a nice NULL pointer dereference instead? There have been some
reports on a NULL queue for sr devices as of lately, I wonder if some
SCSI change recently was broken.
Tejun, I seem to recall you looking at this, but I can't seem to locate
the thread. Did anything come of it?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-06 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-06 0:17 Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2 Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 18:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 18:43 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 19:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 19:51 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 19:58 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 20:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 20:24 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 20:30 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2006-03-06 20:33 ` Jens Axboe
2006-03-06 21:14 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 21:41 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 21:55 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-06 21:57 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-09 15:50 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-03-09 15:54 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-03-09 15:54 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-09 16:04 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-03-09 16:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-09 16:41 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-06 20:36 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 20:53 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 20:56 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 21:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 21:16 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 21:54 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 22:05 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-06 22:08 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 22:27 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 22:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 22:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 22:52 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 22:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-06 23:01 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-06 23:24 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-07 0:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-07 0:25 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-07 3:15 ` Mike Christie
2006-03-07 3:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-07 18:01 ` James Bottomley
2006-03-07 19:40 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-07 8:47 ` [PATCH] slab: fix offslab_limit in calculate_slab_order (Was: Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2) Pekka J Enberg
2006-03-07 17:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-07 19:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-03-07 19:28 ` Slab corruption in 2.6.16-rc5-mm2 Bill Davidsen
2006-03-06 22:44 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-03-06 18:48 ` Mike Christie
2006-03-06 18:49 ` Mike Christie
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-08 6:25 Chuck Ebbert
2006-03-08 8:32 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-08 8:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08 9:02 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-08 9:12 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08 9:23 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-08 14:35 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060306203036.GQ4595@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markhe@nextd.demon.co.uk \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox